Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And in some European countries a decade or three back (I don't know if
it's still the same), the tests for a driver's license had questions about mechanical theory (e.g., what is actually happening under the hood when you put your foot on the clutch?) and practical tests (e.g., changing a wheel). Perhaps today's US driver's licenses are worthless too, and perhaps the people who get them aren't really DRIVERS. Perhaps the only "real DRIVERS" today are the people who pass the tests for membership of the Institute of Advanced Motorists (which existed in Britain when I was growing up, maybe still does) or its equivalent in other countries. Alan AB2OS On 02/02/04 07:17 pm W4JLE put fingers to keyboard and launched the following message into cyberspace: When I took my test in 1957, the FCC guy testing , told me the most difficult test was the amateur advanced. I took the General Ham and all commercial elements through 1st class and RADAR endorsement. At that time, there was a time requirement between the amateur licenses, ergo I was not eligible to take the advanced or extra. Back then You both sent and received Morse, and a solid one minute out of three was the passing mark. The test itself consisted of drawing schematics, supplying missing components to a schematic, etc. Unlike today's NO CODE, No ELECTRONICS exams. The fact that they were tough to pass, marked passage into a select group called HAMS. After waiting about five weeks I finally received that magical piece of paper that allowed me to contact other members of the fraternity. |