Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
And in some European countries a decade or three back (I don't know if
it's still the same), the tests for a driver's license had questions about mechanical theory (e.g., what is actually happening under the hood when you put your foot on the clutch?) and practical tests (e.g., changing a wheel). Perhaps today's US driver's licenses are worthless too, and perhaps the people who get them aren't really DRIVERS. Perhaps the only "real DRIVERS" today are the people who pass the tests for membership of the Institute of Advanced Motorists (which existed in Britain when I was growing up, maybe still does) or its equivalent in other countries. Alan AB2OS On 02/02/04 07:17 pm W4JLE put fingers to keyboard and launched the following message into cyberspace: When I took my test in 1957, the FCC guy testing , told me the most difficult test was the amateur advanced. I took the General Ham and all commercial elements through 1st class and RADAR endorsement. At that time, there was a time requirement between the amateur licenses, ergo I was not eligible to take the advanced or extra. Back then You both sent and received Morse, and a solid one minute out of three was the passing mark. The test itself consisted of drawing schematics, supplying missing components to a schematic, etc. Unlike today's NO CODE, No ELECTRONICS exams. The fact that they were tough to pass, marked passage into a select group called HAMS. After waiting about five weeks I finally received that magical piece of paper that allowed me to contact other members of the fraternity. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
You miss the point completely, there was pride in becoming a ham, simply
because it was difficult. Once obtained, one behaved as a person worthy of being called a ham. The worst behavior I remember back then was W2OY who used to call "CQ No kids, no lids, no drugstore cowboys..." Unlike the profanity of the bands today. With the new age thinking , that finds achievement unfair to those that have not achieved, we have lowered the bar so those who were incapable of competing can be included as well. First it was "why should I learn the code it is only an obstacle to my desires", the point is all endevors in life have a price of admission, if your not willing to pay, you don't get in the show. At least thats the way it used to be, today if I whine enough about fairness someone will give it to me. Where does it end? I want to be a brain surgeon, I just don't want to spend time learning all that medical stuff, it's just not FAIR... Would you want me as your doctor? "Minnie Bannister" wrote in message ... And in some European countries a decade or three back (I don't know if it's still the same), the tests for a driver's license had questions about mechanical theory (e.g., what is actually happening under the hood |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hello Alan and group,
"Minnie Bannister" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... And in some European countries a decade or three back (I don't know if it's still the same), the tests for a driver's license had questions about mechanical theory (e.g., what is actually happening under the hood when you put your foot on the clutch?) This is still going this way. You need to have 15 hours theoretical education and 20 hours driving education under supervision of a driving instructor. Costs you about 1000.- Euros, about 1250 US $. You have to do it with a driving school to securely pass the exam. But the DL then is valid livelong. The only thing they changed is the oral test. They took away most of it and changed it to a standardized computer test. and practical tests (e.g. changing a wheel). They discontinued this, but they teach you how to change a wheel and how to mount snowchains whilst in the practice-hours with your driving instructor. Perhaps today's US driver's licenses are worthless too, and perhaps the people who get them aren't really DRIVERS. I know the difference, I hold a valid California DL for cars, trucks and motorbikes Perhaps the only "real DRIVERS" today are the people who pass the tests for membership of the Institute of Advanced Motorists (which existed in Britain when I was growing up, maybe still does) or its equivalent in other countries. Alan AB2OS This was kind of out of topic. Concerning the amateur license, the test were oral and written, the full nine miles through all the technical and operational questions, for both the CEPT 2 and CEPT 1 licenses. The only difference in testing for HF privileges was the CW test, where you had to send and receive. At my time in the late 80's 13wpm (60 signs per minute), and lateley they dropped to 25 signs per minute, which equals 5 wpm. The test is still held at the Authorities QTH in the state capitals. After the recent workaround of the requirements after the WRC 2003 in Geneva, You are not requested to make the CW test. But you can do it voluntary after seperate application, and as long as the authority will be able to supply CW capable Examiners Best regards and 73 de OE8SOQ Helmut |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|