Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 07:27:39 -0800, John Smith
wrote: Dave wrote: ... Most all verticals have higher noise levels than horizontal antennas. Reason, as it is reported, is that man made noise is vertically polarized. Dave: Frankly, I think that the statement, "most man made noise is vertical polarized" is a myth. How many power lines do you see running Perhaps the explanation for the observation that the vertically polarised component of man made noise is greater at a receiver antenna than the horizontal component lies in the propagation mechanism. Most man made noise is received from nearby and by ground wave, and vertically polarised ground waves are attenuated less than horizontally polarised waves over the same path. This explanation is supported by the observation that the closer one is to a high intensity man made noise source (but still within radiating far field), the less variation in field strength with antenna polarisation. Owen -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mr. Static - Index: The On-Line Resource for Static-Related Compliance Issues | Shortwave | |||
question re GE Superadio III static | Dx | |||
question re GE Superadio III static | Dx | |||
Road static? | Antenna | |||
FM Reception Static Problem | Antenna |