Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
art wrote:
Cecil if a static charge has a time varying field applied by gravity would it have radiatiatonal properties and if so would it not be vertically polarised? Can't be true as it is not printed in a book ! Whoa there, Art. There seems to be confusion between two topics. As far as I know, there is no obvious difference between the precipitation static levels on a horizontal Vs vertical antenna. That this particular antenna is vertical is mostly irrelevant to the alleged precipitation static problem. It could just as easily be happening with a horizontal antenna. The fact that the noise might be attributed to something other than precipitation static might involve vertical polarization but I don't think precipitation static has much to do with polarization. A wind-driven charged particle is just as likely to encounter a vertical wire as a horizontal wire. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mr. Static - Index: The On-Line Resource for Static-Related Compliance Issues | Shortwave | |||
question re GE Superadio III static | Dx | |||
question re GE Superadio III static | Dx | |||
Road static? | Antenna | |||
FM Reception Static Problem | Antenna |