Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 15th 06, 05:01 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 442
Default Rain Static ?


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
t...

snip

I just heard
on The Discovery Channel that a certain percentage of the
static we hear is left over from the Big Bang that happened
some 12.5 billion years ago.


Yes and no. There certainly is something termed galactic noise and most of
it has apparently been ricocheting around the cosmos all this time. It was
first discovered by Bell Labs scientists using a supercooled microwave
amplifier whose noise was higher than expected. They covered the feedhorn
and lo! ... The noise dropped!

http://www.amsat.org/amsat/archive/a.../msg00336.html retells
part of the story.

There's no way any of us will be affected by galactic background, however,
We'd need a system noise temperature better than 3K (That's 3 Kelvin, not
3,000) to detect it. The best consumer LNA's are way noisier. BTW, some
parts of the sky are "hotter" than this background level; if we use a low
noise TVRO dish system, we could detect a few star clusters. Of course the
sun and the moon can be detected.


  #2   Report Post  
Old December 15th 06, 01:46 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default Rain Static ?

Sal M. Onella wrote:
There certainly is something termed galactic noise and most of
it has apparently been ricocheting around the cosmos all this time. It was
first discovered by Bell Labs scientists using a supercooled microwave
amplifier whose noise was higher than expected. They covered the feedhorn
and lo! ... The noise dropped!

http://www.amsat.org/amsat/archive/a.../msg00336.html retells
part of the story.


Yes, that's what the TV documentary was all about.

There's no way any of us will be affected by galactic background, however,


The same TV documentary said that 1/2 of one percent
of the noise on a blank TV screen is caused by background
radiation from the Big Bang. I was reporting what they
said, not what I had measured.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
  #3   Report Post  
Old December 16th 06, 06:09 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 442
Default Rain Static ?

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
. net...

The same TV documentary said that 1/2 of one percent
of the noise on a blank TV screen is caused by background
radiation from the Big Bang.


I buy that. 3K out of approximately 300K on a linear scale is 1%. If it's
50/50 between Big Bang noise and "other," then 1/2 of one percent is spot
on.

Thanks.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mr. Static - Index: The On-Line Resource for Static-Related Compliance Issues RHF Shortwave 0 February 10th 06 10:31 AM
question re GE Superadio III static ronaug Dx 2 December 10th 04 03:55 PM
question re GE Superadio III static ronaug Dx 0 December 9th 04 03:40 PM
Road static? John Smith Antenna 19 January 11th 04 03:55 PM
FM Reception Static Problem mBird Antenna 2 October 19th 03 03:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017