Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Same for ordinary citizens with concealed handgun permits. The violent crime rate has nose-dived in the USA while sky-rocketing in Australia, Canada, and the UK. Got data or just rehashing AM talk shows? Somehow I don't recall anything sky-rocketing in Canada, let alone violent crime, but then again, I've been away for five years - is anyone still alive there? As for the US, the crime rate cycle closely follows the economy. 73 ... WA7AA -- Anti-spam measu look me up on qrz.com if you need to reply directly |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zoran Brlecic wrote:
Got data or just rehashing AM talk shows? Latest stats reported by "First Freedom" magazine. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Got data or just rehashing AM talk shows? Latest stats reported by "First Freedom" magazine. Care to share? Not that I'm against carrying concealed and blasting the criminals away, mind you. It's just that these type of claims have regularly fallen under the urban legend category, i.e. fantasy. 73 ... WA7AA -- Anti-spam measu look me up on qrz.com if you need to reply directly |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zoran Brlecic wrote:
Care to share? Not that I'm against carrying concealed and blasting the criminals away, mind you. It's just that these type of claims have regularly fallen under the urban legend category, i.e. fantasy. I threw it away after reading. As I remember, crime in the US is down 35% while crime in the UK is up 35%. Canada and Australia were also mentioned as having increasing crime rates along with their increasingly restrictive gun laws. Even in the US, the highest crime rates are the states that have the strictest gun laws. If you were a criminal, would you rather break into a house in New York City or Dallas? While I was living near Phoenix, "The Phoenix Sun" reported that an attempted robbery using a knife at a local Circle-K was foiled by an ordinary customer who was carrying a concealed weapon. "First Freedom" magazine carries about ten similar reports per month where the good guys' guns foil the bad guy's violent crimes. But apparently that is not newsworthy enough for the liberal newspapers. On another note, the local Madisonville Meteor carried the following story. "C.G. was arrested for not driving without a license." :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Care to share? Not that I'm against carrying concealed and blasting the criminals away, mind you. It's just that these type of claims have regularly fallen under the urban legend category, i.e. fantasy. I threw it away after reading. As I remember, crime in the US is down 35% while crime in the UK is up 35%. Canada and Australia were also mentioned as having increasing crime rates along with their increasingly restrictive gun laws. Well, I'd be extremely skeptical about this type of "statistics". For one, I am sure they were not comparing the same periods, and there are numerous tricks available for anyone who is attempting to prove anything with statistical figures. Take, for example, the US 35% reduction in crime rate. It is more than likely that this figure was achieved by comparing the crime rate from the peak of a recession to its bottom. The US crime rate always faithfully follows the economy - employed people don't have to resort to crime. No connection to the CCW whatsoever. What about the "increasing crime rate" in the UK or Canada? CCW has never been legal in these countries to begin with, yet both countries have the crime rate ten times lower than the US. I bet the mag never raised that issue. Even in the US, the highest crime rates are the states that have the strictest gun laws. If you were a criminal, would you rather break into a house in New York City or Dallas? That's not how it works. A criminal in Dallas doesn't wake up one day and decide to break into a house, following up with a visit to the local library to do research on where he's less likely to get shot, then catching a bus to Big Apple. Also, the crime rate - gun law strictness comparison is a common post hoc fallacy. Is it possible that the relationship is inverse: because those states have the highest crime rates, they instituted the strictest gun laws? While I was living near Phoenix, "The Phoenix Sun" reported that an attempted robbery using a knife at a local Circle-K was foiled by an ordinary customer who was carrying a concealed weapon. It happens. However, this type of testimonial evidence proves little. I'm not sure that as a neutral bystander I'd like to be in the middle of a shoot-out between the criminals and armed civilians. Even the police makes numerous mistakes in these types of situations, and we are to believe that any Joe Blow is capable of handling a situation where even the cops call for backup first. "First Freedom" magazine carries about ten similar reports per month where the good guys' guns foil the bad guy's violent crimes. I'm sure they do. If I were the editor of a magazine pandering to the gun owners, I'd do the same, while completely ignoring the negative aspects. But apparently that is not newsworthy enough for the liberal newspapers. "Liberal", as usual being defined as anything a person calling himself a conservative hates in a given moment? A friendly reminder: fat-ass hypocrite AM talk show drug addicts don't get to define liberalism and liberals, especially not with their hate propaganda. 73 ... WA7AA -- Anti-spam measu look me up on qrz.com if you need to reply directly |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zoran Brlecic wrote:
"Liberal", as usual being defined as anything a person calling himself a conservative hates in a given moment? I'm not a conservative and didn't vote for Bush. I'm a libertarian. I believe in as much freedom from governmental intervention as is feasible. Republicans want to limit my social freedoms. Democrats want to limit my economic freedoms. I'm against both of them. My offhand comment wasn't designed to turn this thread into an endless tirade against guns by gun-haters. Guns work well for personal defense in the hands of trained average citizens. The percentage of concealed carry permit holders involved in crimes is miniscule compared to the general population. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HAM EQUIPMENT DONATIONS NEEDED | Antenna | |||
DONATIONS NEEDED | Antenna | |||
AMATEUR RADIO GEAR WANTED | Antenna | |||
AMATEUR RADIO EQUIPMENT WANTED | Antenna | |||
Amateur Radio Legal Issues List | Antenna |