| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
January 24th 07, 11:35 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Antennas led astray
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: There is no such thing as a "Universal Time Frame". Isn't assuming that Earth time is an absolute reference a lot like assuming that the Earth is the center of the universe? Yeah, but I didn't say anything about Earth time or an absolute reference. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
#2
January 25th 07, 03:46 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Antennas led astray
wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: wrote: There is no such thing as a "Universal Time Frame". Isn't assuming that Earth time is an absolute reference a lot like assuming that the Earth is the center of the universe? Yeah, but I didn't say anything about Earth time or an absolute reference. I was agreeing with you and expanding a bit. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
|
#3
January 25th 07, 03:54 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Antennas led astray
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: wrote: There is no such thing as a "Universal Time Frame". Isn't assuming that Earth time is an absolute reference a lot like assuming that the Earth is the center of the universe? Yeah, but I didn't say anything about Earth time or an absolute reference. I was agreeing with you and expanding a bit. Cecil: I am glad you responded here, I had missed a very good thing in Jims' text--absolute reference. I like "Absolute Time Reference" much, much better than "Universal Time-Frame." Regards, JS |
|
#4
January 25th 07, 05:05 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Antennas led astray
John Smith I wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: wrote: There is no such thing as a "Universal Time Frame". Isn't assuming that Earth time is an absolute reference a lot like assuming that the Earth is the center of the universe? Yeah, but I didn't say anything about Earth time or an absolute reference. I was agreeing with you and expanding a bit. Cecil: I am glad you responded here, I had missed a very good thing in Jims' text--absolute reference. I like "Absolute Time Reference" much, much better than "Universal Time-Frame." No surprise there. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
#5
January 25th 07, 05:05 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Antennas led astray
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: wrote: There is no such thing as a "Universal Time Frame". Isn't assuming that Earth time is an absolute reference a lot like assuming that the Earth is the center of the universe? Yeah, but I didn't say anything about Earth time or an absolute reference. I was agreeing with you and expanding a bit. OK. I have a bit of a hair trigger when babblers are present. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
