Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
gwatts wrote:
Richard Clark wrote: On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:40:32 GMT, gwatts wrote: I was tired of design reviews where management pushed the 'you can cut this out, it won't be so bad' line. Hi OM, My very first EE professor (also an engineer at the HP division in Colorado Springs) taught us the merits of designs meeting the expectations of Mad Man Muntz...he would snip out components until they lost the picture, it would roll, or the sound would go dead. Then he would suggest they put back in the last snipped component. He discovered his TVs didn't need synchronization circuits because his market was in urban cities where the signal was so powerful as to provide enough level to be self-syncing. I know, because I fixed many of those TVs that eventually found their way into the Burbs, and were forever rolling unless you found the sweet spot on the horizontal or vertical adjustment (always in the back). Yes, I've heard the tales of M. M. Muntz, but apparently so had the head designer at the audio mfr I worked at. They had a VCA circuit using a well known VCA chip. The data sheet notes mentioned a small value capacitor across two pins for stability. The designer discovered his circuit would work just as well without the cap and thus left it out of his design, so far out that there weren't even traces or pads to put the cap in should it become necessary (you can see where this is going, no?). The VCA vendor outsourced fabrication of the chip and all of a sudden the noise level of the VCA circuit would jump about 70 dB as the fader reached the bottom of travel, not desirable in an audio application. I spent a little time perusing the data sheets and our schematics, noticed the cap omission, soldered a cap across the pins of an offending circuit and within the hour we had the assemblers tack soldering caps we bought at a local electronics shop (not RS) onto assembled modules. The designer's comment was 'Well, it worked for quite a while...' Later we found customers with similar noise level jumps using pre-outsourced VCAs. Yes, they saved a few pennies on each module but lost about two dozen customers when they figured out what had been left out of their very expensive audio equipment. When I started at that place I was told not to make suggestions regarding modifications of existing designs lest I offend the managing 'engineer'. This reminds me of an old story about how you can become a hero in Detroit. Save 1/2 cent each on 10 million washers. To become a bum in Detroit, have those washers cause a 10 million car recall. Dave N |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
thinking about some new gear | Shortwave | |||
Intuitively {To My Way of Thinking} for an In-the-Attic Antenna the Horizontal [Flat] Loop Antenna offers these Benefits : | Shortwave | |||
Thinking about buying a Satellit 800... | Shortwave | |||
Thinking about buying a Satellit 800... | Shortwave | |||
Thinking about a wideband receiver... | Shortwave |