Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RST Engineering" ) writes:
Because he's got a SINGLE frequency interfering with his station. To hell with covering the entire band. A single parallel resonant network will do something in the order of 80 dB of rejection if the L and C are at LEAST something reasonable for Q. Care to calculate the order of filter that will do 80 dB as a low pass filter? And the Q of the components necessary to make the insertion loss negligible at 160 meters? At the very least, it's far easier to put in a single LC notch filter to see what it does to the offending signal. I was trying to think of things that could be done easily to determine whether the problem is actually the transmitter or simply receiver overload. One can easily assemble an LC circuit in the broadcast band with available parts to try this out, while a high pass filter requires paying good money for it and likely mail-ordering, or at the very least ordering multiple coils to build up such a thing. My first receiver was a cheap low end solid-state Hallicrafters in 1971, and it overloaded terribly. I don't think anything could have been done to fix it, but I know one time I took the parts list from the Handbook for the high pass filter that was in there to solve the problem of AM broadcast stations, and the parts store said they didn't have the coils in stock, and they'd cost a pretty penny (certainly a pretty penny for a 12 year old). Michael VE2BVW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #746 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #746 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #721 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #716 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #699 | General |