Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Tom,
as far as I am concerned, your observations are rights only if we are talking about real quantities. If you have a load that is complex then you obtain perfect matching (there is no reflection) only if Z0 is not equal to Zin but it is the conjugate of Zin. If you remember, this is the same condition valid for the maximum power transferring when the load in complex. Do you agree with these considerations? Regards, Camelot I'm not sure where you got it, but the formula with the complex conjugate is NOT correct! The formula without complex conjugate is correct, for complex Z and Z0, both. That the formula using the complex conjugate is incorrect is trivial to see: consider that a line terminated in a load equal to the line's characteristic impedance (be it purely resistive, or complex) has no reflection. That is, if load Z = Z0, there is no reflection. Then if Z0 is complex and has a non-zero reactive component, your formula yields S11 which is not zero, for a line which is terminated to have no reflection. As far as I am concerned, that would be incorrect. The original formula, without complex conjugate, yields the correct answer for this case. Can you come up with a case where it is incorrect? Cheers, Tom- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amplifier output matching | Homebrew | |||
Is it possible to have a 1:1 SWR? | Antenna |