Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 21, 2:15 pm, "art" wrote:
Roy that is the sort of posting I would expect from the likes of you. When everything comes to light you are going to look a real fool, possibly in your next lifetime... [snip] At least Roy is going to wait a while. You on the other hand.... |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Feb, 06:27, "Wes" wrote:
On Feb 21, 2:15 pm, "art" wrote: Roy that is the sort of posting I would expect from the likes of you. When everything comes to light you are going to look a real fool, possibly in your next lifetime... [snip] At least Roy is going to wait a while. You on the other hand.... Possibly true as my health is not that good but you never know what can happen at the next hamfest. I know americans tell the world that if you are not with us then you are against us and that shows O so true with this newsgroup. It wasn't that long ago that you all lined up like lemmings castigating the idea of static fields and it connection to electomagnetic fields and yes insulting names flew. You ask to be given stuff as a right and when you succeed the atmospere gets even worse. I remember about ten years ago that Roy stated himself as the pervayer of truth with respect to ham radio and in the following decade many real experts have come and gone because of intolerance on this newsgroup such there is now just one or two left and where we lost out on a lot of experience purely because of Roy and others. Now you have inrefutable truth laid out in front of you regarding the Gaussian field which leads to a new breed of antennas especially with regard to polarities outside the horizontal and vertical polarities which consumes hams. The facts are now out with respect to Gaussian antennas and you can't possibly suppress it by portraying only yourselves as the pervayors of truth,. Industry desires more compact antennas, industry demands antennas where fields are variable. Industry demands antennas where there is purity of polarity and diversity and no amount of decrying by hams are going to deny this entrance to antenna theory. I know many take the hint from Roy and a couple of others as to when to turn it on and many are willing to follow but Gaussian antennas have arrived and tho the future may not be known Roy's denials of the validity just doesn't stand up in the world outside this very small group. You can't halt the advance of science by saying THAT YOU ARE WITH AMERICA OR AGAINST US by purely diminishing the number of true experts in this group to make yourself more dominant.Yess I am vulnerable to many because of poor health but I may yet outlast Roy in this world that changes so rapidly! Honis soir que maly pence( Royal Army Ordinance Corp of the U.K) Art |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dipole Antenna {Doublet Aerial} make from Power "Zip Cord" or Speaker Wire and . . . More 'About' the Doublet Antenna | Shortwave | |||
The "Green" Antenna for AM/MW Radio Reception plus Shortwave Too ! | Shortwave | |||
Why Tilt ? - The Terminated Tilted Folded Dipole (TTFD / T2FD) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Passive Repeater | Antenna | |||
Grounding | Shortwave |