Owen Duffy wrote:
You could devise an example with an AC source that had exactly the same
outcome, more complicated mathematics to solve it, but the exactly the
same outcome.

But the point is that I can devise an example with an
AC source that has the opposite outcome simply by using
a Norton equivalent source. When the reflection arrives,
the dissipation doubles.
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote in news:KGhKh.7646$yW.5893
@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net:

Owen Duffy wrote:
You could devise an example with an AC source that had exactly the same
outcome, more complicated mathematics to solve it, but the exactly the
same outcome.

But the point is that I can devise an example with an
AC source that has the opposite outcome simply by using
a Norton equivalent source. When the reflection arrives,
the dissipation doubles.

Your Norton equivalent doesn't pretend to replicate my (real) source in
every way, it only pretends to supply the same voltage and current to its
load... and it does that.

Owen

Owen Duffy wrote:
Your Norton equivalent doesn't pretend to replicate my (real) source in
every way, ...

I thought we were discussing general principles, not
replicating a special case example in every way.
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com