Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Art,
Having a patent does not mean that one have something that really works. I did a survey on patents in the field of Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) and Sailboard Fins. Many of the patents I saw, are useless, seen from a technical perspective. The problem with those technically useless patents is that when you invent some really nice operating principle, you may interfere with such a patent. In that case it is the available money that counts only. So for me, to be involved in a patent application does not support the fitness of a new theory. I'm one of the pseudo-experts that posted to one of your "very deep question" on Faraday Rotation in NEC2 and/or NEC4. Best Regards, Wim |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gaussian law and time varying fields | Antenna | |||
electric & magnetic fields ?? | Antenna | |||
Electric and Magnetic fields | Antenna | |||
On address fields in AX.25 packets | Digital | |||
On address fields in AX.25 packets | Digital |