Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23 Mar 2007 09:21:07 -0700, "Dr. Honeydew"
wrote: Thank you, Mr. Clark. But I'm having trouble reconciling what you wrote with what Mr. Harrison posted about the output impedance being equal to the conjugate of the load which dissipates the most power. Clearly the 40 ohm load dissipates more power than the 50 ohm load, so we don't see how your answer and Mr. Harrison's posting can both be correct. It is a problem of apples and oranges. Your source is not representative of either a commercial transmitter, nor a amateur transmitter. It is a precision source. It has no need to exhibit impedance matching, and is thus not designed to perform that purpose. It is happy to run quite inefficiently as efficiency is a discardable quality. Rather, it is incumbent upon you to enforce matching by careful load selection. Otherwise, its utility is wasted and makes it a rather expensive choice for a general purpose signal generator. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The power explanation | Antenna | |||
again a few words of explanation | General | |||
again a few words of explanation | Policy | |||
Explanation wanted | Antenna | |||
New ham needing explanation on radios | General |