Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Mar 2007 17:01:36 GMT, Ed
wrote: With all other aspects of it remaining the same, there certainly is a significant difference in loss figures when the dielectric is changed from solid to foam. Hi Ed, Actually, all other aspects do not remain the same when you go from one dielectric to the other. The size of the inner conductor changes, and with it so does loss. The loss is in the conductor, not the dielectric. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote in
: On 26 Mar 2007 17:01:36 GMT, Ed wrote: With all other aspects of it remaining the same, there certainly is a significant difference in loss figures when the dielectric is changed from solid to foam. Hi Ed, Actually, all other aspects do not remain the same when you go from one dielectric to the other. The size of the inner conductor changes, and with it so does loss. The loss is in the conductor, not the dielectric. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC I will eat my words! My previous experience has apparently been comparing apples and oranges. I just compared Belden 9913 with 9914... the only real difference between these two being one has a solid dielectric and the other a foam dielectric.... the loss differences were basically non-existant! Sorry for all the bother! Ed K7AAT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Coax Connectors, Adapters & Bulk Coax Cable | Swap | |||
Coax To Coax Noise transfer ? | Antenna | |||
Coax To Coax Noise Transfer ? | Shortwave | |||
Skywire coax cable vs. regular coax cable | Antenna | |||
FS:RG8X 18 FT LENGTH COAX WITH COAX CONNECTOR | Swap |