Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Keith Dysart wrote: On Apr 6, 11:03 pm, Walter Maxwell wrote: It is true, however, that two non-coherent fields from two different sources would just plow through each other with no effect on either. Can one not change the location of the nulls by changing the phase relationship of the two sources? If so, it would seem to me that two non-coherent fields are simply fields without a constant phase relationship and as such, the nulls are constantly moving; still present, but not stationary. ...Keith Andy writes: Correct. One example is a television signal that is received from two sources : 1) a direct line to the transmitting tower and 2) a reflection from an airplane flying . Even tho both received signals are generated from the same source, the reflected signal will be changing in amplitude and phase as the reflector, the airplane, moves along it's flight path. The two signals combine at the receiving antenna and the resultant signal into the receiver will rise and fall, depending on the resultant amplitude and phase. The maximum can be several db above the direct signal and the null can be many many db BELOW the direct signal. Hence, you see the image come and go for several seconds on your screen. After several seconds the plane will have moved to a position such that the reflection doesn't hit your antenna anymore, and the problem goes away. We've all seen this. In fact, 70 years ago, this effect (on radio signals) was what inspired the development of radar..... Andy W4OAH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
BPL interference | Shortwave | |||
FM Interference when the sun comes up | Broadcasting | |||
Interference | Shortwave |