Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Fuller wrote:
However, it shows that the null you believe demonstrates some permanent interaction and annihilation of EM waves is simply a special case. http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/j...ons/index.html "... when two waves of equal amplitude and wavelength that are 180-degrees ... out of phase with each other meet, they are not actually annihilated, ... All of the photon energy present in these waves must somehow be recovered or redistributed in a new direction, according to the law of energy conservation ... Instead, upon meeting, the photons are redistributed to regions that permit constructive interference, so the effect should be considered as a redistribution of light waves and photon energy rather than the spontaneous construction or destruction of light." In classical, non-cosmic, non-relativistic conditions EM waves do not interact in free space. This condition is so widely understood in the scientific world that it becomes a prime candidate for argument on RRAA. Florida State University seems to disagree. "Upon meeting" in free space, the interfering photons are "redistributed". RF waves are EM waves. Just because we cannot see them is no reason to assert that they act differently from EM waves that we can see. Hecht, in "Optics", says about interference: "At various points in space, the resultant irradiance can be greater, less than, or equal to I1 + I2 depending on the value of I12 ..." I12 is previously defined as the interference term. Hecht's "various points in space" seem to contradict your assertion that waves "do not interact in free space". From Born and Wolf: "Thus if light from a source is divided by suitable apparatus into two beams which are then superposed, the intensity in the region of superposition is found to vary from point to point between maxima which exceed the sum of the intensities in the beams, and minima which may be zero." If "region of superposition" is not referring to the free space point of interference, to what is it referring? When one can see with one's own eyes the interaction of two light beams in free space, how can you possibly deny the existence of that interaction? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
BPL interference | Shortwave | |||
FM Interference when the sun comes up | Broadcasting | |||
Interference | Shortwave |