LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Report Post  
Old April 7th 07, 05:43 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Constructive interference in radiowave propagation

Gene Fuller wrote:
However, it shows that the null you believe demonstrates some permanent
interaction and annihilation of EM waves is simply a special case.


http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/j...ons/index.html

"... when two waves of equal amplitude and wavelength that are
180-degrees ... out of phase with each other meet, they are not
actually annihilated, ... All of the photon energy present in
these waves must somehow be recovered or redistributed in a new
direction, according to the law of energy conservation ... Instead,
upon meeting, the photons are redistributed to regions that permit
constructive interference, so the effect should be considered as a
redistribution of light waves and photon energy rather than the
spontaneous construction or destruction of light."

In classical, non-cosmic, non-relativistic conditions EM waves do not
interact in free space. This condition is so widely understood in the
scientific world that it becomes a prime candidate for argument on RRAA.


Florida State University seems to disagree. "Upon meeting"
in free space, the interfering photons are "redistributed".
RF waves are EM waves. Just because we cannot see them is
no reason to assert that they act differently from EM waves
that we can see.

Hecht, in "Optics", says about interference:

"At various points in space, the resultant irradiance can
be greater, less than, or equal to I1 + I2 depending on
the value of I12 ..." I12 is previously defined as the
interference term. Hecht's "various points in space"
seem to contradict your assertion that waves "do not
interact in free space".

From Born and Wolf: "Thus if light from a source is divided
by suitable apparatus into two beams which are then superposed,
the intensity in the region of superposition is found to vary
from point to point between maxima which exceed the sum of the
intensities in the beams, and minima which may be zero."

If "region of superposition" is not referring to the free
space point of interference, to what is it referring?

When one can see with one's own eyes the interaction of
two light beams in free space, how can you possibly deny
the existence of that interaction?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interference E.F. Shortwave 13 October 23rd 05 02:12 PM
Interference Paul Merrill Shortwave 8 January 18th 05 07:06 AM
BPL interference JJ Shortwave 0 April 10th 04 01:50 AM
FM Interference when the sun comes up Ty Ford Broadcasting 1 October 18th 03 05:39 AM
Interference Warpcore Shortwave 6 September 5th 03 05:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017