Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 8, 7:09 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: Do Born and Wolf offer crisp definitions of the boundaries between coherent, partially coherent, and mutually incoherent? Or is it a continuum arbitrarily divided into 3 regions for the purposes of discussion? The IEEE Dictionary has an interesting definition for "degree of coherence". Imax means intensity maximum and Imin means intensity minimum. Visibility = (Imax-Imin)/(Imax+Imin) Light is considered "highly coherent" when Visibility exceeds 0.88 and "partially coherent" when Visibility is less than 0.88. Incoherent for "very small values" of Visibility. This is good; a continuum with high coherence at one end, low coherence at the other and medium in the middle, and, of course, since the ends are infinitely small, no such thing as perfect coherence or "NO" coherence (at least in the real world). This then takes us back to the original point; there is always some interference, though it may be small enough that an engineer does not find it of interest. ....Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
BPL interference | Shortwave | |||
FM Interference when the sun comes up | Broadcasting | |||
Interference | Shortwave |