Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith Dysart wrote:
This is good; a continuum with high coherence at one end, low coherence at the other and medium in the middle, and, of course, since the ends are infinitely small, no such thing as perfect coherence or "NO" coherence (at least in the real world). But remember that definition is for fiber optics sources, not amateur radio sources. Coherency in amateur radio systems can get as close as a zero reading on a reflected power meter. Still there are those nagging assertions of Born and Wolf that for two equal magnitude signals, the total intensity possible for incoherent signals is double the intensity of one signal. The total intensity possible for coherent signals is four times the intensity of one signal. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
BPL interference | Shortwave | |||
FM Interference when the sun comes up | Broadcasting | |||
Interference | Shortwave |