Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 10, 4:46 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: Any example where reflected energy is allowed to reach the source cannot be analyzed in any valid real-world way. A strange assertion. Consider two wire phone lines; transmitter and receiver at each end. Consider cable modems; ditto. Consider computer busses; ditto. We are discussing ham radio sources, Keith, which are none of the above. How many hams use cable modems for their RF transmissions? Please get real. Are you sure there are different rules for ham radio sources than for all the other ones? Something different about them? Something that makes them not amenable to the techniques used for others? If that is so, I am surprised at your claim that ham radio sources have something in common with light bulbs and lasers such that knowledge of those subjects can help analysis, while any knowledge of the behaviour of other electrical circuits is for naught. Seriously though, it does all work. The problems are solvable. You don't need to throw up your hands and say: "too tough." And then rationalize this response by calling them "too different" or saying "insufficient information". Much can be learned by solving the problems set using more controlled examples. Try it. Using the regular techniques will produce the same answer for all the problems you can currently solve, as well as allowing you to solve ones you currently declare as unsolvable. ....Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
BPL interference | Shortwave | |||
FM Interference when the sun comes up | Broadcasting | |||
Interference | Shortwave |