Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith Dysart wrote:
Are you sure there are different rules for ham radio sources than for all the other ones? Something different about them? Something that makes them not amenable to the techniques used for others? You are using the rules of superposition in your examples. I don't know if the rules of superposition apply to those other sources but I do know that a ham transmitter, like my IC-706, is not linear enough to abide by the rules of superposition. How is superposition supposed to handle foldback? Ham transmitters cannot willy-nilly be shorted and opened in order to ascertain their linear model characteristics. A signal generator equipped with a circulator load solves all the experimental problems but doesn't act like a ham transmitter. Seriously though, it does all work. The problems are solvable. If that is true, why hasn't anyone ever solved them, published the results, and ended the arguments? The "solutions" produce different results depending upon whose brain is being used. Nobody has ever *solved* the problem and therefore the argument still continues to rage. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
BPL interference | Shortwave | |||
FM Interference when the sun comes up | Broadcasting | |||
Interference | Shortwave |