Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Right. But the question still remains, what is your claim regarding the exact nature of the "redistribution" if NOT reflection from a partially reflective surface? It is impossible for a "partially reflective surface" to reflect 100% of the intensity. My two step process explains 100% reflection. Walt's virtual short explains 100% reflection. How do *you* explain 100% reflection from a partially reflective surface? Time to cease the mealy-mouthing and hand-waving and give us some facts. A B i=1.0 | i=5.83 | i=1.0 100w laser---air---|--1/2WL thin-film--|---air---... --Pref1=0w | --Pref2=100w | --Pref3=0w Pfor1=100w | Pfor2=200w-- | Pfor3=100w-- The intensity reflection coefficient seen by the internal reflected wave is 0.5 yet the net reflection is 100%. I have explained how that is possible through wave cancellation. You have not explained how that is possible without wave cancellation. Time to put up or shut up. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
BPL interference | Shortwave | |||
FM Interference when the sun comes up | Broadcasting | |||
Interference | Shortwave |