Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: It is impossible for a "partially reflective surface" to reflect 100% of the intensity. But that's wrong. If it was right, then a partially reflective surface couldn't be used to prevent reflections either. Think about the transient period. You're right that after the first bounce only half the intensity, for example, is apparent. But using the physical reflection coefficient you can plot the intensity increase steadily as a function of time all the way up to steady state. That's because at every time t, the remainder of all previous reflections are superposed. Yes, interference describes macroscopically what happens - it's a short cut to steady state. But nothing about the reflective surface changes - before or after steady state. It is only your idea of 'energy in the wave' that needs to change a little. 73, ac6xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
BPL interference | Shortwave | |||
FM Interference when the sun comes up | Broadcasting | |||
Interference | Shortwave |