Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: Partially reflective surfaces cannot, by themselves, reflect 100% of the incident energy. They can and certainly do when no energy is passing through the reflecting surface. In such a case the only energy conveyed by the wave is that which is reflected. The 100% number comes not in a single bounce, or from a single wavefront. But I don't expect you to understand this. The waves existed along with their energy components before they were canceled. I believe your misunderstanding probably lies somewhere within that statement. It does not convey concise meaning. What happens to those energy components after the waves are canceled. Where there are waves, there is energy. Where there are no waves, there is no energy. Show me the canceled waves. 73, Jim AC6XG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
Interference | Shortwave | |||
BPL interference | Shortwave | |||
FM Interference when the sun comes up | Broadcasting | |||
Interference | Shortwave |