Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 14th 07, 12:09 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Analyzing Stub Matching with Reflection Coefficients

On 13 Apr 2007 15:56:26 -0700, "Wes" wrote:

On Apr 13, 11:40 am, Richard Clark wrote:


[lotsa good stuff snipped]

A poor physical open or poor physical short will never be
improved by ANY transmission line mechanics.


Well, I dunno about that. Try this experiment:

Take a "poor" short, say 1 ohm, and transform it through a lossless
1/4 wavelength line of Zo=200 ohm. The result will be 40,000 ohm.
Now transform this 40K ohm load through another lossless 1/4
wavelength line of Zo=10 ohm. The result of this transformation will
be a "virtual" 0.003 ohm.

Is that an improvement? [g]


Hi Wes,

There is always a rational example to deflate absolutisms. Thanx for
the interesting twist of transmission line.

However, I wouldn't want to be the wallet that pays for this.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stub Matching software ? 4nec2 Antenna 13 December 12th 06 04:24 PM
Analyzing Woger Not Lloyd General 27 April 6th 06 06:24 PM
Analyzing Woger Not Lloyd Policy 27 April 6th 06 06:24 PM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to Tdonaly Antenna 4 August 25th 03 09:01 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017