Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
It seems that you are contradicting yourself by saying that all the information in the component waves is still there after superposition yet you say the phase is gone. Both statements cannot be true. Cecil, Both statements are true. Superposition does not favor one description over the other. If there is no phase information remaining in the superposed result (the standing wave) then there is no phase information remaining at all, regardless of your mathematical manipulations. There are no hidden variables. Someone else recently pointed out that Mother Nature does not care what models we use; the underlying physical reality will be the same. You continue to try to get around that fundamental principle, but it won't work. 73, Gene W4SZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
folded dipoles | Antenna | |||
About dipoles and current/voltage nodes | Antenna | |||
60 meter dipoles | Antenna | |||
Two dipoles on one coax | Antenna | |||
Dipoles! | Antenna |