On 4 May 2007 08:25:20 -0700, art wrote:

Why not do something really constructive and help Frank with his
program? For the life of me
I do not understand why those familiar with NEC in this group aren't
helping the guy.

Hi Art,

He doesn't need help with NEC, obviously. After four or five rounds
of correspondence he eked out the necessary details to test a claim,
and found it was unconfirmable.

If he needs any help, it is getting a complete description (hence, why
it took him four or five rounds of filling in gaps in the first
place). If he now has the complete description (something you NEVER
acknowledge), then the analysis is complete.

Given both your software and his (and ours) all use the same
calculating engine, then it remains a challenge as to how you arrive
at your results. When you toss in statements like resonance achieved
with significant reactance, or elements that resonate at a third of
their wavelength dimension, one has to wonder even more about your
fundamental failures of first principles.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC