Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "art" wrote in message oups.com... On 4 May, 03:58, "Dave" wrote: Thus contrary to dismissing Maxwell I am confirming the laws by an independent avenue. ah, so your antenna can't be any different than any other parasitically coupled antenna. you can wave your hands all you want about equilibrium and adding time to gauss'es law where it doesn't need to be. but if your antennas conform to the standard maxwell equations and can be modeled with standard modeling software, then they are nothing new. So what is the big deal about them? and why try to patent something that has nothing new to it??? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mininec antenna computor programs and Gaussian arrays | Antenna | |||
Gaussian antenna aunwin | Antenna | |||
RCA Multiple Antenna Array from the World Trade Center | Shortwave | |||
A gaussian style radiating antenna | Antenna | |||
Phased array antenna patterns | Antenna |