Hi Art,

If you are, as you say, interested in where you depart from simple
physics; then an enumeration follows:

On 10 May 2007 06:29:46 -0700, art wrote:

1)
I know that mass is not constant in
itself since it is always self adjusting to maintain equilibrium.
Mass is constant unless you are performing nuclear reactions. You
don't have sufficient energy to do that at home.

2)
would also appear that what is emitted is so small and numourous that
it can be seen as a cloud or a field.
You don't have sufficient energy at home to force emission. An
incandescent antenna is one that would be readily obvious to everyone
for miles around.

3)
I also believe there is some sort of consensus that these two clouds
There are not two of anything in emission.

4)
are still somewhat homogenous after they have escaped from the initial
gravitational forcesi.e merging of these entities is achieved beyond
the arbitary border.
Gravity is fundamentally one of the weakest forces in nature, emission
requires considerable energy and would easily eclipse its influence.

5)
Some have gone off at a tangent by introducing 377 ohms as a ratio
which ofcourse is an impossibility which destoys the credability of
their whole statement.
This ratio is a fact of nature. You could, of course, change it by
changing nature, or having invented an underwater CB antenna.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC