| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
May 11th 07, 03:25 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Electron ratio to form a radiation field
On 10 May 2007 19:15:32 -0700, art wrote:
I used to call 377 ohms an impedance Hi Art, All impedances are ratios. Nothing has changed since 1864. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
|
#2
May 11th 07, 03:38 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Electron ratio to form a radiation field
On 10 May, 19:25, Richard Clark wrote:
On 10 May 2007 19:15:32 -0700, art wrote: I used to call 377 ohms an impedance Hi Art, All impedances are ratios. Nothing has changed since 1864. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Right on. I understood for once your posting now that you are not including flim flam. If that is what you believe I am comfortable in following suit. Is this now the end of this thread? Do we now have closure? |
|
#3
May 11th 07, 04:27 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Electron ratio to form a radiation field
On 10 May 2007 19:38:25 -0700, art wrote:
Is this now the end of this thread? Hi Art, This latest sub-thread only marks one of your five errors you asked to be identified. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
|
#4
May 11th 07, 04:56 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Electron ratio to form a radiation field
On 10 May, 20:27, Richard Clark wrote:
On 10 May 2007 19:38:25 -0700, art wrote: Is this now the end of this thread? Hi Art, This latest sub-thread only marks one of your five errors you asked to be identified. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Hmm, go ahead, hopefully somebody will still be hanging around. |
|
#5
May 11th 07, 06:10 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
Electron ratio to form a radiation field
On 10 May 2007 20:56:04 -0700, art wrote:
On 10 May, 20:27, Richard Clark wrote: On 10 May 2007 19:38:25 -0700, art wrote: Is this now the end of this thread? Hi Art, This latest sub-thread only marks one of your five errors you asked to be identified. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Hmm, go ahead, hopefully somebody will still be hanging around. No need to, they are already enumerated elsewhere. What has been remarkable about this thread is that its efficiency has peaked at 20%. - roughly 43.517% above average. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FA: @$10NOS LEWIS & KAUFMAN, Ltd. LOS GATOS 254 ELECTRON TUBERARE | Boatanchors | |||
| WTB: Tube, electron = 6DR7 | Swap | |||
| FA: EIMAC 3-500Z ELECTRON TUBE AND HR-6 PLATE CAP | Swap | |||
| Lennie's Back In Form...Old Rant's...Same Form... | Policy | |||
| inducors/form factors/radiation revisited | Antenna | |||
Hybrid Mode
