Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31 May 2007 08:58:09 -0700, art wrote:
I cringe at the idea of the news media filtering out the garbage! It is for the viewer to determine what is garbage and what is not. Unfortunately very few viewers have either the education or experience to make that determination. It's like computer literacy. Now days much of the population has computers, but only a very small percentage is truly computer literate. As a grad assistant I taught the intro to computer science. The level of knowledge in those students was scary and that was at the university level. Many a multimillionaire owes his fortune to what others have considered garbage where others have deemed themselves as educated enough to detrmine what is garbage and what is treasure. However they were working from sound scientific or business principles, not something that violates the laws of physics. Look at the good side of this picture instead of piling on ridicule. Here we have is a human being who is fighting for something new and beneficial to all with all the energy and education that he has within him so that he can hold on to life. The life he has is enjoyable because he believes he is on the brink of success, where his life is still usefull instead of lying on a hospital bed. For a human to be brought from sadness into happiness is a wonderfull thing that typifies the human race and encouragement is what a human needs instead of derision to enjoy a life that has been given him. It is not sad to see a life ending in enjoyment but it is sad to pile on derision on how a human carries on the fight for life even in the light of a meagre education. What is more sad it when some one is encouraged to go on a "fool's errand" and gives the "man on the street" false hope, so in the end instead of one disappointed person, thousands have their false hopes dashed. Realistically tinkerers, engineers, and scientists alike all know their individual searches may end up in failure and accept that as a fact of life. If he was my grandpa I would encourage him until the end and be very proud of him and not use my education to discourage him. Actually the news media should use that story for those people who are interested in what is good in life as well as those Although this approach sounds charitable to create false hopes in the person doing the research and those who believe in it is very cruel. To encourage research, experimentation, and to push the envelope is good, but to give false hope even in the name of charity is not. I would far rather work under the sense of what I do has he odds against it rather than a false grandiose hope that would or could leave me and worse yet those who believed in me with dashed hopes. To point out the failings in a piece of research is not derision, as long as it is done in a respectful manner. It is in fact an attempt to help the individual rather than to encourage them to pursue "junk science". Mankind has been looking for perpetual motion since we had enough brain power to envision such a fallacy. Most any engineer can show the weakness behind this idea and prove them. Yet there are those who believe we can violate the laws of physics/nature with impunity and there are those who encourage it. There are many things far more practical and rewarding for the individual and society as a whole that are much more likely to succeed. Those are the things we should encourage. who only have derision for the efforts of others. Regards Art |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Jun, 22:01, "Roger (K8RI)" wrote:
On 31 May 2007 08:58:09 -0700, art wrote: I cringe at the idea of the news media filtering out the garbage! It is for the viewer to determine what is garbage and what is not. Unfortunately very few viewers have either the education or experience to make that determination. My O my. I know that America is a big Country but I never realised that Communist ideals were lying secretly under some rocks waiting for an opportunity to broadcast its ideals. When does America start burning all books and pick up the refrain of the resident couch experts? Does this reflect the ideals of the antenna experts on this newsgroup? Obviously they are not having success when it comes to suppression with respect to antennas Art |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger (K8RI) wrote:
... Unfortunately very few viewers have either the education or experience to make that determination. It's like computer literacy. Now days ... Unfortunately, very few people have the where-with-all to determine what others can or cannot determine and are unjustified it attempting to do so ... Yanno, you kinda look like one of 'em ... ahhh, perhaps it is just the lighting ... JS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
WA3MOJ crahses and Burns!!! | CB |