On 1 Jun, 09:31, "Jimmie D" wrote:
"Richard Clark" wrote in message

...





On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:03:09 -0700, art wrote:

From the above one can see that approx 15 dbi is the most
that can be expected from a forced inline array with the pattern
of radiation staying constant showing that max efficiency has
been reached. I will leave it to others to give their take on the
above
listing.

Hi Art,

With 2 minutes of modeling (and using the only 3 element yagi model
offered by EZNEC for FREE), I got 15.14 dBi.

Why does a gaussian array need 10 elements to get less?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Has there ever been a definition of a guassian array. From the best I can
figure ART just claimed it otbe a bunch of random lengths mounted on a boom
but every time I see a model he presents its just a mucked up yagi.

Jimmie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:03:09 -0700, art wrote:

# el boom lth inches gain dbi
4 460 14.85

Let's see, by adding one more element to the NBS Yagi, I got 15.72
dBi.

This means that the NBS yagi is 110% efficient compared to a gaussian
array. This is due to the physics of Newtonian Bales which is
superior to gaussian bundles.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On Jun 1, 11:30 am, Richard Clark wrote:


This means that the NBS yagi is 110% efficient compared to a gaussian
array. This is due to the physics of Newtonian Bales which is
superior to gaussian bundles.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hummm, I think newtonian bales, and gaussian bundles are both inferior
to cluster &^%$'s... :/
MK

On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 06:54:21 -0700, wrote:

Hummm, I think newtonian bales, and gaussian bundles are both inferior
to cluster &^%$'s... :/

Hmmmm, that's the first time I've seen &^%$ take the possessive - but
you're right, that's what we're gettin'.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC