On 21 Jun, 14:11, "Richard Fry" wrote:
Art wrote about "Gaussian antenna in planar form" Newsgroup members,
Thought I would give you another example to laugh at.
(etc)

___________

ART: Probably some of your readers are hoping for your
posts in plainer form, so they might hope to understand
what you mean.

RF

I did my best in answering questions even in the face of ridicule.
Any more questions are probably repeats but I still keep trying
knowing
that in the main the interest is not the antenna but the missives
fired.
Not one person has stated what parts he does understand and needs help
to move on to the next step. But I can't make up for education not
taken by the posters. Even with basic mathematics there are many
that say you can't add the same thing to both sides of a mathematical
equation, so how can I help such people? I stated that the elements
as is the antenna as a whole is in equilibrium, they respond that
it is a botched form of Yagi. They then ask what is meant by
equilibrium and
I say that the current in the elements change direction at the same
time,
and they don't accept that. Yes it is all my fault, I am a fraud,
the antenna can't possibly work, I have not explained it well enough
for the lower educated, if it worked people would be knocking at my
door,
If it worked then I knew about it all along. Yes I knew about it but
I didn't think it would work so I forgot about it. What use is it
and on and on.It seems that this newsgroup is a microcosm of the
direction
of where ham radio is going but I keep hoping that somebody will come
along
and show me where I am wrong but unfortunately the real experts have
decided that they don't need all these insults and have moved on.