Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 24, 9:51 pm, art wrote:
Majority of whiny "woe is the U.S." drivel deleted... I suppose the question has to be asked, is this group representitive of an America that we want to see in our grandchildrens future or does arrogance have a down side of a World wide nature? Art If you spent 2 percent of the time actually providing facts about your antennas, as you do all this whiny "woe is Art drivel", you would not have near the problem you do. As an example, Tom Ring said: ****Tom All I am asking of Art, and I've asked before, is that he give us the dimensions of one of his wonder antennas. If he gives us one of the simpler ones, he has given little away, but will allow us to confirm his claims. Since we, as a group of stupid EEs, can't possibly figure out how to duplicate his method of making another better one, he has nothing to lose. ***** Do you try to provide any of this info, which would be required to make any kind of decent analysis of the antenna? No, You are sitting here wasting your time with me, acting basically like a whiner. It's kinda of sickening to me... I'm a redneck. Rednecks generally find whiners to be kind of disgusting... I think what it boils down to, is you want patent "Validation" via usenet.. LOL... Kind reminds me of that Edwards guy that says he talks to dead people... He's just a slick cold reader.. I also hear he probably bugs the waiting rooms, etc. Maybe you should try his show for better results.. I know for myself, I still don't have any clue what this antenna really looks like, how it's fed, etc.. One day you say all the elements are fed in "equilibrium", which most rational people would probably assume all are fed in phase as a driven array. But then you change your mind and say only one element is actually fed. So being no one can tell how it's fed, we can only assume it's a close spaced yagi with unoptimum element lengths, or a driven array. Most of us don't buy all the voodoo science mumbo jumbo.. But you can't even enlighten anyone to how it's actually fed. You would rather waste time writing line, after line, after line, after line, after line, after line, of whiny "woe is Art" drivel. Yuri had it right. You should call it the "Geussian" antenna. I've only said this about 29 times, but why don't you just ignore everyone and build the freaking thing and see if it works for yourself. It's obvious not many others seem to care one way or the other. But I don't think you can even get around to that because you are too busy whining all the time. Unbelievable... I'm not going to bother you anymore about it. I think it's hopeless. I'll just continue to chuckle along in the background. You are better than the comedy channel any day of the week. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gaussian antenna aunwin | Antenna | |||
FS WiNRADiO AX-31B Planar Log-Periodic Antenna | Swap | |||
how to feed a planar monopole antenna using ie3d | Antenna | |||
FA: WiNRADiO AX-31B PLANAR LP ANTENNA | Swap | |||
FA: WiNRADiO AX-31B Planar Log-Periodic Antenna | Scanner |