Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I have a Uniden 996 scanner and would really like to pick up some marine traffic from Boston Harbor. Live about 20 miles due west of the harbor. Have a Scantenna antenna which I think is "pretty good". It's up in my attic. It's omni directional, and broadband over the typical scanner ranges (supposedly). I can often pick up coast guard conversations, but very rarely (but ooccassionally) ship traffic. Do you think a dedicated, very directional, and tuned to the marine freq's would help, or am I just too far away ? Any thoughts on, or antenna suggestions would be most appreciated. No idea what to buy, if you feel it's worth a try ? Very interested in the AIS data being transmitted by ships at around 162 MHz, as well as general marine stuff. BTW: really surprised that I hear the CG at all. I would have thought that their antennas would be "focused" out to sea, with any propagation going the other way (towards me) minimized to maximize the effectiveness of their radiated power in the direction that it's needed. Thoughts ? Thanks, Bob |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:10:26 -0400, "Robert11"
wrote: Hi, I have a Uniden 996 scanner and would really like to pick up some marine traffic from Boston Harbor. Live about 20 miles due west of the harbor. Have a Scantenna antenna which I think is "pretty good". It's up in my attic. It's omni directional, and broadband over the typical scanner ranges (supposedly). I can often pick up coast guard conversations, but very rarely (but ooccassionally) ship traffic. Do you think a dedicated, very directional, and tuned to the marine freq's would help, or am I just too far away ? Any thoughts on, or antenna suggestions would be most appreciated. No idea what to buy, if you feel it's worth a try ? Very interested in the AIS data being transmitted by ships at around 162 MHz, as well as general marine stuff. BTW: really surprised that I hear the CG at all. I would have thought that their antennas would be "focused" out to sea, with any propagation going the other way (towards me) minimized to maximize the effectiveness of their radiated power in the direction that it's needed. Thoughts ? Thanks, Bob I suggest you get your antenna out of the attic and put it outside as high up as you can get it. For VHF height is everything. Danny, K6MHE |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert11 wrote:
Hi, I have a Uniden 996 scanner and would really like to pick up some marine traffic from Boston Harbor. Live about 20 miles due west of the harbor. Have a Scantenna antenna which I think is "pretty good". It's up in my attic. It's omni directional, and broadband over the typical scanner ranges (supposedly). I can often pick up coast guard conversations, but very rarely (but ooccassionally) ship traffic. Increasing your antenna height would probably improve reception more than increasing antenna gain at that distance. Theoretically, ships will switch to low power (~5 watts) when they enter the harbor, but you should still hear them. I think pilot-to-tug communication is done with portable, hand-held radios. Very low power is needed for distances on the order of a few hundred feet and antenna height is quite close to the water. So you may not be able to hear these communications from your distance. If you look he http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache...lnk&cd=2&gl=us Chapter 11 â–* Coast Pilot 1 you will find some info on which VHF channels ships would normally use (#13) in their approach to Boston Harbor. Also, you can see that transmissions are brief and occur at specific points. Unlike the USCG, which recites a 1,000 word, mostly unintelligible, preamble to every announcement, ship traffic in a crowded harbor is likely to be terse and easy to miss. A call to the Harbormaster or a posting to a marine newsgroup (rec.boat.electronics) could get a more definitive answer. Chuck ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 12, 7:10 am, "Robert11" wrote:
Hi, Do you think a dedicated, very directional, and tuned to the marine freq's would help, or am I just too far away ? Sure, I did the same thing once. Except I'm 55-65 miles from the gulf, instead of 20.. I built a 4 el yagi for 162 mhz. Worked great, and I could hear boats that didn't exist on the omni vertical. MK |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... On Jun 12, 7:10 am, "Robert11" wrote: Hi, Do you think a dedicated, very directional, and tuned to the marine freq's would help, or am I just too far away ? Sure, I did the same thing once. Except I'm 55-65 miles from the gulf, instead of 20.. I built a 4 el yagi for 162 mhz. Worked great, and I could hear boats that didn't exist on the omni vertical. MK I used to pick up tons of stuff about 20 miles away with just a vertical antenna at about 50 ft. My experience with VHF/UHF in the attic has not been good. I think asphalt shingles are pretty good RF absorbers at that frequency. Jimmie |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert11" wrote in message . .. Hi, I have a Uniden 996 scanner and would really like to pick up some marine traffic from Boston Harbor. Live about 20 miles due west of the harbor. Have a Scantenna antenna which I think is "pretty good". It's up in my attic. It's omni directional, and broadband over the typical scanner ranges (supposedly). I can often pick up coast guard conversations, but very rarely (but ooccassionally) ship traffic. Do you think a dedicated, very directional, and tuned to the marine freq's would help, or am I just too far away ? Any thoughts on, or antenna suggestions would be most appreciated. No idea what to buy, if you feel it's worth a try ? Very interested in the AIS data being transmitted by ships at around 162 MHz, as well as general marine stuff. BTW: really surprised that I hear the CG at all. I would have thought that their antennas would be "focused" out to sea, with any propagation going the other way (towards me) minimized to maximize the effectiveness of their radiated power in the direction that it's needed. Thoughts ? Thanks, Bob Hi Bob Do you want to try building your own antenna? If so, I'd think a simple antenna like a J-pole ( http://www.hamuniverse.com/jpole.html ) would be worth trying. Jerry |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jerry Martes" wrote in message news:TYAbi.3722$O15.28@trnddc03... "Robert11" wrote in message . .. Hi, I have a Uniden 996 scanner and would really like to pick up some marine traffic from Boston Harbor. Live about 20 miles due west of the harbor. Have a Scantenna antenna which I think is "pretty good". It's up in my attic. It's omni directional, and broadband over the typical scanner ranges (supposedly). I can often pick up coast guard conversations, but very rarely (but ooccassionally) ship traffic. Do you think a dedicated, very directional, and tuned to the marine freq's would help, or am I just too far away ? Any thoughts on, or antenna suggestions would be most appreciated. No idea what to buy, if you feel it's worth a try ? Very interested in the AIS data being transmitted by ships at around 162 MHz, as well as general marine stuff. BTW: really surprised that I hear the CG at all. I would have thought that their antennas would be "focused" out to sea, with any propagation going the other way (towards me) minimized to maximize the effectiveness of their radiated power in the direction that it's needed. Thoughts ? Thanks, Bob Hi Bob Do you want to try building your own antenna? If so, I'd think a simple antenna like a J-pole ( http://www.hamuniverse.com/jpole.html ) would be worth trying. Jerry Yes it is worth trying. I can pick a telemetry transmitter nearly 30 miles away that only puts out about 5 watts on just above 400Mhz. There are 2 transmitters there and I can only pick up one .The one I cant pick up has its antenna at about 20ft above the ground , the other is a 50 ft. Just an example of what a difference heigth makes. Jimmie |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Robert11 wrote: Have a Scantenna antenna which I think is "pretty good". It's up in my attic. It's omni directional, and broadband over the typical scanner ranges (supposedly). I can often pick up coast guard conversations, but very rarely (but ooccassionally) ship traffic. Do you think a dedicated, very directional, and tuned to the marine freq's would help, or am I just too far away ? Could very well help, especially if you can get it up above the attic into clear air. In fact, the height of the antenna may make more difference than antenna gain/directionality. My guess is that your current antenna is high enough up to pick up the shore antennas (which are probably tower- or building-mounted) but is too low to be in good line-of-sight to the ships themselves. Review the page at http://www.connect802.com/height.htm - it has a chart showing the required height-above-ground of an antenna, to "see" another antenna past the earth's curvature. Any thoughts on, or antenna suggestions would be most appreciated. No idea what to buy, if you feel it's worth a try ? Take a look at http://www.wa5vjb.com/yagi-pdf/cheapyagi.pdf Simple, decent-performing Yagi antennas that you can throw together with a piece of one-by-two wood for the beam, some stiff copper wire, and a soldering iron. I'd suggest taking the dimensions for the simplest (3-element) 144 MHz antenna, and rescaling them all by a factor based on the _highest_ marine-band frequency you want to receive. You'll need to rescale the element lengths, and the distances between the elements. You'll end up with a Yagi which is intermediate in size between the 144- and 220-MHz versions. Very interested in the AIS data being transmitted by ships at around 162 MHz, as well as general marine stuff. BTW: really surprised that I hear the CG at all. I would have thought that their antennas would be "focused" out to sea, with any propagation going the other way (towards me) minimized to maximize the effectiveness of their radiated power in the direction that it's needed. At most, I'd think that they'd use an antenna with a cardioid or off-center-circular pattern, so that a single shore station's signal would cover the whole half-circle with fairly equal power. There's probably still quite a bit of back-spill towards shore - plenty enough for you to receive. They wouldn't use (or need to use) an antenna with an extremely high front-to-back ratio, because they have no need to "reject" transmissions from shore-side... since there probably aren't any. Increasing the front-to-back ratio would just add complexity and expense to the antenna, reducing its overall reliability (more things to break), at no significant benefit in received-signal quality or desired-direction output power. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 12, 11:10 pm, "Robert11" wrote:
Hi, I have a Uniden 996 scanner and would really like to pick up some marine traffic from Boston Harbor. Live about 20 miles due west of the harbor. Have a Scantenna antenna which I think is "pretty good". It's up in my attic. It's omni directional, and broadband over the typical scanner ranges (supposedly). I can often pick up coast guard conversations, but very rarely (but ooccassionally) ship traffic. Do you think a dedicated, very directional, and tuned to the marine freq's would help, or am I just too far away ? Any thoughts on, or antenna suggestions would be most appreciated. No idea what to buy, if you feel it's worth a try ? Very interested in the AIS data being transmitted by ships at around 162 MHz, as well as general marine stuff. BTW: really surprised that I hear the CG at all. I would have thought that their antennas would be "focused" out to sea, with any propagation going the other way (towards me) minimized to maximize the effectiveness of their radiated power in the direction that it's needed. Thoughts ? Thanks, Bob hi bob ..if you want really good reception on vhf marine band ,you should consider buying a ham 2mtr band base antenna . these work on 147mhz and will work just as good on the marine band for receive. hope this helps ... bob vk4la in australia |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert11" wrote in message . .. Hi, I have a Uniden 996 scanner and would really like to pick up some marine traffic from Boston Harbor. Live about 20 miles due west of the harbor. snip No idea what to buy, if you feel it's worth a try ? snip Thoughts ? I googled for marine band colinear and got this near the top: http://buyreliant.com/marine/5102.htm It's way cheaper than some name-brand competitors, like Shalespeare, but you're not going to be stressing it on a boat, so give it a try on your rooftop or chimney. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What's It Worth? | Shortwave | |||
Really low SWRs but is it worth trimming the antenna | Antenna | |||
dual cb antenna is it worth the trouble | Antenna | |||
Worth-More 600 SS Amp | Equipment | |||
FS: Worth-More 600 SS | General |