On 14 Jun, 16:02, "amdx" wrote:
"art" wrote in message

ups.com...



On 14 Jun, 14:35, Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:24:18 -0700, art wrote:
My point is that it is not "gone and long forgotten" despite
the venom from you and Roy in you attempts to devalue the idea.

Hi Arthur,

Unfortunately you don't understand the technology, so you lack the
authority to make this anything more than a sentimental statement.

My website contains more than 300 pages of results from real Fractal
antennas and it remains the largest website in the world devoted to
that topic alone. It even supports examples of fractal designs that
you couldn't beat.

Care to compare examples? Mine will be far more length efficient than
anything you could offer. They will be non-planar. They will offer a
better turning radius than yours.

No, comparison would quickly reveal all this and thus I will leave you
with the last gasping denial. ;-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Do you think I didn't realise what direction you was heading?
Look at mine not at his!
I remember after you did that work you turned on Chip and
everything he had to say. Heck it then got worse when the
group found out that he was jewish. That was mana for the
group and finally got the job done to get rid of him.
No matter how much shame you feel that will be part of
you forever. Can you remember the last time you said
something nice? That should take a week or so to think about.
You are such a miserable person, always pushing good aside
for the benefit of evil.If your page is the only thing
you can point to as to what you have achieved in the
last twenty years you are indeed in a sorry state.

Hey you two, stop it,
this is my thread about EZNEC modeling and Flag antennas. :-)
Mike- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Noted and understood. Its national 'flag" day is it not?
With respect to EZNEC. MANA is much more ambedextrous than
Eznec. It does provide all the old stuff that eznec does
but it also supplies what is new from the last decade.
When you model using optimisation where the program
predetermines direction to take it opens up a whole
new world with respect to antenna design.
Ofcourse even optimisation is not new to antennas
which is why the program is offered for free to
amateurs. There is also a newsgroup based on MANA
so there is no need to search the amateur newsgroups
for the author to report bugs.
I don't think eznec can match it in any way, even
with the allowable number of segments used let
alone the number of variables available. If you
want to design an antenna that is in equilibrium
so that focussed radiation is denied it is just
one type of antenna design that cannot be met
using eznec. A lot of time has passed by since
eznec came on the scene as well as many changes
and additions with respect to antenna programs
so why impede your antenna learning by using
old technology? It certainly cannot be the cost.
Art