| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Chuck" wrote in message ... Several authors recommend against end-fed dipoles because of alleged difficulties in matching to a 50-ohm line. Unfortunately, the "slur" is dropped without a hint of explanation. Other authors see it as simple and reliable, and recommend it with enthusiasm. A parallel tuned circuit with tapped inductor is usually the recommended impedance transformer. In my own experience, matching has always been extremely easy and trouble-free. So does anyone know why this might be thought so frought with problems that its general use would be discouraged? Chuck, NT3G Take a google at "J-Poles" - an end-fed half-wave. (I'm reluctant to call it a dipole.) The 2-meter version of the j-pole is used by bunches of folks. The matching section at the bottom allows hooking it up to 50-ohm cable. I have not tried it on lower frequencies. But hey - making antennas is fun, so get hold of an antenna analyzer, and play eee ha |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| folded dipoles | Antenna | |||
| can i cophase 4 dipoles? | CB | |||
| feeding vertical dipoles | Antenna | |||
| Two dipoles on one coax | Antenna | |||
| Dipoles! | Antenna | |||