| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Harrison wrote:
Cecil, W5DXP wrote: "Seems the word "pole" requires an adjective to define the context for antennas." It should not hurt. My dictionary says a dipole antenna is a straight conductor usually fed in the center. However, dipole characteristics are determined by current distribution, not the feeding if the feeder doesn`t radiate. Seems to me, technically speaking, the two poles in a "dipole" are electrical with opposite voltage polarities at each end of the 1/2WL dipole. An electric monopole has only one electrical pole, like a magnetic monopole has only one magnetic pole. A 1/2WL end-fed wire would then technically be a dipole and the passive elements on a resonant Yagi would be dipoles. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| folded dipoles | Antenna | |||
| can i cophase 4 dipoles? | CB | |||
| feeding vertical dipoles | Antenna | |||
| Two dipoles on one coax | Antenna | |||
| Dipoles! | Antenna | |||