Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "art" wrote in message ups.com... On 29 Jun, 07:02, art wrote: On 25 Jun, 13:10, "Dave" wrote: Ok, lets try it this way... step by step, inch by inch, we may yet figure out what this antenna is. First question: What is the least number of wires needed to build a gaussian antenna? Posting check Art Isaac Newton like scientist before him observed the World and the Universe for clues about what it was all about. He determined that each particle, each object, each planet all had their own gravitational centers. And where each minute particle was made of atoms etc all orbiting around each other in a state where these orbiting partcles were able to move in isolation with respect to other particles in orbit because all forces became balanced with respect to each other. This theory was based on observations on the make up of the universe around us. This balancing of parts and particles is called being in a state of equilibrium. If an exterior force was applied the Universe has a whole would rearrange itself to retain equilibrium by accomodation Thus we can see an element as something held together by equilibrium and where its constituent parts is a densily packed swarm of particles shaped in longitudinal physical form and where the surface of this entity has its surface completely covered by errant particles called electrons. This collection of particles are so densly packed that it appears to be a solid and where the make up of its constituent particls and atoms provide a distingtive appearance which allows identification with respect to other combinations of densly packed swarms of particles and atoms via weight, reflective qualities e.t c I have stated the above in a very generalistic way purely to give an understanding of the meaning of the word "equilibrium" which in a generalistic way can be seen as a somewhat stable existance of parts in concert with other parts in a three dimensional existance where its "stable" existance is created because of the totalility of all forces involved equals the sum of ZERO. Art Unwin KB9MZ....XG but an antenna is by necessity a dynamic thing. it is meant to be radiating or absorbing energy which to me means it can not be in equilibrium. it also must have rapidly varying currents and voltages such that even along the length of the wire there is no equilibrium, electrons pack up tighter in one area and less in another forcing currents to flow continually. even a wire that is not directly fed from a transmitter has currents and voltages based on how close it is to a wire driven from a transmitter, it's orientation, and it's length. electrically if all the fields from a wire summed up to zero there could be no power flowing and hence no antenna. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gaussian statics law | Antenna | |||
Gaussian statics law | Antenna | |||
Gaussian antenna aunwin | Antenna | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
Gaussian law and time varying fields | Antenna |