Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 30th 07, 09:25 PM posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default (OT) : Radium - In Another Life You Would Have Made A Great High School Science Teacher

RADIUM,

IMHO - In another life "Radium" you would have
made a great High School Science Teacher :
Who's Students when on to do great things with
their lives :
Because You "Radium" Touched Them With A
Thirst For Knowledge And A Quest For Answers.

-but- These NewsGroups are NOT a High School
Science Class -and- "Radium" you are just being
'radium'. = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radium
decaying into a gas and dispersing into nothingness.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radon

-alas- "Radium" Your Half-Life of Readable Interest
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-life
is at best about 16.04 Seconds ~ RHF
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 7th 07, 08:58 PM posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default What Was "Radium's" Original Question ? -and- Has It Been Answered ? AM electromagnetic waves: 20 KHz modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency

On Jun 29, 7:41 pm, Radium wrote:
Hi:

Please don't be annoyed/offended by my question as I decreased the
modulation frequency to where it would actually be realistic.

I have a very weird question about electromagnetic radiation,
carriers, and modulators.

Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal [in this
case, a pure-sine-wave-tone] with a frequency of 20 KHz and an
amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose
frequency is 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000)
nanocycle* every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 giga-
eons and whose amplitude is a minimum of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-
power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaphotons per 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-
power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond?

If it is not mathematically-possible, then please explain why.

10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) second is an
extremely short amount of time. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-
power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond is even shorter because a
nanosecond is shorter than a second.

Giga-eon = a billion eons

Eon = a billion years

*nanocycle = billionth of a cycle

Gigaphoton = a billion photons

10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 -- now that is one
large large number.

10^1,000,000,000 = 10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000

So you get:

(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the-
power-1,000,000,000)

10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) = 10^-(10-to-the-
power-1,000,000,000)-to-the-power-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000)

10^-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the-
power-1,000,000,000) is an extremely small number at it equals 10-to-
the-power-NEGATIVE-[(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-
to-the-power-1,000,000,000)]

No offense but please respond with reasonable answers & keep out the
jokes, off-topic nonsense, taunts, insults, and trivializations. I am
really interested in this.

Thanks,

Radium


WHAT WAS "RADIUM'S" ORIGINAL QUESTION ?
-and- HAS IT BEEN ANSWERED ?

Hi:

Please don't be annoyed/offended by my question as I decreased the
modulation frequency to where it would actually be realistic.


I have a very weird question about electromagnetic radiation,
carriers, and modulators.


Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal [in this
case, a pure-sine-wave-tone] with a frequency of 20 KHz and an
amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose
frequency is 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000)
nanocycle* every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 giga-
eons and whose amplitude is a minimum of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-
power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaphotons per 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-
power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond?


If it is not mathematically-possible, then please explain why.


10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) second is an
extremely short amount of time. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-
power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond is even shorter because a
nanosecond is shorter than a second.


Giga-eon = a billion eons


Eon = a billion years


*nanocycle = billionth of a cycle


Gigaphoton = a billion photons


10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 -- now that is one
large large number.


10^1,000,000,000 = 10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000


So you get:


(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the-
power-1,000,000,000)


10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) = 10^-(10-to-the-
power-1,000,000,000)-to-the-power-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000)


10^-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the-
power-1,000,000,000) is an extremely small number at it equals 10-to-
the-power-NEGATIVE-[(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-
to-the-power-1,000,000,000)]


No offense but please respond with reasonable answers & keep out the
jokes, off-topic nonsense, taunts, insults, and trivializations. I am
really interested in this.


Thanks,


Radium



  #3   Report Post  
Old July 7th 07, 09:46 PM posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 47
Default What Was "Radium's" Original Question ?

That's easy. Radium has never actually had an original
question. All of his questions are either rehashing very
well-understood situations, or are utterly nonsensical and
therefore not answerable AS legitimate questions.

Bob M.


  #4   Report Post  
Old July 8th 07, 12:08 AM posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 13
Default What Was "Radium's" Original Question ? -and- Has It Been Answered ?



RHF wrote:

WHAT WAS "RADIUM'S" ORIGINAL QUESTION ?
-and- HAS IT BEEN ANSWERED ?


Does it matter ?

It's only attention seeking.

Graham

  #5   Report Post  
Old July 8th 07, 12:31 AM posted to sci.electronics.basics,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default What Was "Radium's" Original Question ? -and- Has It Been Answered ? AM electromagnetic waves: 20 KHz modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency

On Jul 7, 4:08 pm, Eeyore
wrote:
RHF wrote:
WHAT WAS "RADIUM'S" ORIGINAL QUESTION ?
-and- HAS IT BEEN ANSWERED ?



- Does it matter ?
-
- It's only attention seeking.
-
- Graham

Graham - Thank You for the Attention ) ~ RHF
- - - You are Reply # 228 . . . and still Counting.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency Radium[_2_] Antenna 39 July 3rd 07 05:52 AM
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency Radium[_2_] Shortwave 17 July 3rd 07 05:37 AM
DC waves??? Magic frequency??? Peter O. Brackett Antenna 19 May 24th 07 10:07 PM
Electromagnetic frequency allocations in xml ? [email protected] General 0 December 10th 05 05:47 PM
Which digital readout receivers always show the carrier frequency no matter what mode? Richard Shortwave 5 December 5th 04 12:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017