Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jeff Liebermann wrote: "Bob Myers" hath wroth: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" wrote in message .. . No nonlinearity is necessary in order to hear a beat? Where does the beat come from? An audible beat tone is produced by the constructive and destructive interference between two sound waves in air. Look at a pictorial representation (in the time domain) of the sum of sine waves,of similar amplitudes, one at, say, 1000 Hz and the other at 1005, and you'll see it. Bob M. I beg to differ. There's no mixing happening in the air. compression of air is very linear (Boyles Law or PV=constant). In general, that's true, but take a look at what happens in the throats of high-powered horn loudspeakers. You can find info in e.g. "Acoustics" by Beranek. Isaac |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
isw hath wroth:
I beg to differ. There's no mixing happening in the air. compression of air is very linear (Boyles Law or PV=constant). In general, that's true, but take a look at what happens in the throats of high-powered horn loudspeakers. You can find info in e.g. "Acoustics" by Beranek. Isaac What am I suppose to look for? I appreciate your recommended research project, but frankly, I don't care what happens inside a high powered horn loudspeaker. I prefer to stay fairly on topic about the original allegation that mixing somehow occurs in open air, which is not true. Incidentally, if mixing did occur in open air or inside the ear, you would not be able to comfortably listen to hi-fi music, as all you would hear would be intermodulation products. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... isw hath wroth: I beg to differ. There's no mixing happening in the air. compression of air is very linear (Boyles Law or PV=constant). In general, that's true, but take a look at what happens in the throats of high-powered horn loudspeakers. You can find info in e.g. "Acoustics" by Beranek. Isaac What am I suppose to look for? I appreciate your recommended research project, but frankly, I don't care what happens inside a high powered horn loudspeaker. I prefer to stay fairly on topic about the original allegation that mixing somehow occurs in open air, which is not true. Incidentally, if mixing did occur in open air or inside the ear, you would not be able to comfortably listen to hi-fi music, as all you would hear would be intermodulation products. Yes everything would become ultra sonici |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jeff Liebermann wrote: isw hath wroth: I beg to differ. There's no mixing happening in the air. compression of air is very linear (Boyles Law or PV=constant). In general, that's true, but take a look at what happens in the throats of high-powered horn loudspeakers. You can find info in e.g. "Acoustics" by Beranek. Isaac What am I suppose to look for? Information about the nonlinearity of air; what else? You said "compression of air is very linear", but there are situations in acoustics where it is not. Isaac |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:12:56 -0700, Jeff Liebermann
wrote: isw hath wroth: I beg to differ. There's no mixing happening in the air. compression of air is very linear (Boyles Law or PV=constant). In general, that's true, but take a look at what happens in the throats of high-powered horn loudspeakers. You can find info in e.g. "Acoustics" by Beranek. Isaac What am I suppose to look for? I appreciate your recommended research project, but frankly, I don't care what happens inside a high powered horn loudspeaker. I prefer to stay fairly on topic about the original allegation that mixing somehow occurs in open air, which is not true. --- That's not true. The original allegation was mine, and was that since the ear is a device with an "output" which doesn't change linearly with linearly changing input amplitudes, it's a non-linear device, is incapable of _not_ producing harmonics and heterodynes and, as such, is where the mixing occurs. My contention was that zero-beat was the difference frequency between two input tones close to unison, and I still maintain that's true and that that difference frequency is in there. However, your contention that zero-beat is the result of the vector summation of two tones close to unison is also valid, since a non-linear detector is capable of doing that summation well enough to allow that be the dominant phenomenon as evidenced by the fact that the ear is incapable of directly detecting (say) a 1Hz tone but is fully capable of hearing the 1Hz amplitude warble which would result from the vector addition of the two tones. --- Incidentally, if mixing did occur in open air or inside the ear, you would not be able to comfortably listen to hi-fi music, as all you would hear would be intermodulation products. --- _All_ you would hear? That's grossly untrue. What do you think would happen to the _played_ notes? They'd all disappear in a cacophony of chaos just because some lower-level cross-products were being produced? Nonsense. In fact, contrary to what you may believe, the ear _is_ a non-linear detector and, consequently, _cannot_ help but heterodyne its inputs. That's why, after thousands of years of experimenting with what notes sound good when they're played together and which notes don't, music is written the way it is. Something else you may not be aware of is that musical instruments are inherently non-linear and, as such, will generate harmonics of any fundamental notes played on them and heterodynes if two or more notes are played simultaneously. -- JF |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "isw" wrote in message ... In article , Jeff Liebermann wrote: "Bob Myers" hath wroth: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" wrote in message .. . No nonlinearity is necessary in order to hear a beat? Where does the beat come from? An audible beat tone is produced by the constructive and destructive interference between two sound waves in air. Look at a pictorial representation (in the time domain) of the sum of sine waves,of similar amplitudes, one at, say, 1000 Hz and the other at 1005, and you'll see it. Bob M. I beg to differ. There's no mixing happening in the air. compression of air is very linear (Boyles Law or PV=constant). In general, that's true, but take a look at what happens in the throats of high-powered horn loudspeakers. You can find info in e.g. "Acoustics" by Beranek. Isaac Red herring. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" wrote: "isw" wrote in message ... In article , Jeff Liebermann wrote: "Bob Myers" hath wroth: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" wrote in message .. . No nonlinearity is necessary in order to hear a beat? Where does the beat come from? An audible beat tone is produced by the constructive and destructive interference between two sound waves in air. Look at a pictorial representation (in the time domain) of the sum of sine waves,of similar amplitudes, one at, say, 1000 Hz and the other at 1005, and you'll see it. Bob M. I beg to differ. There's no mixing happening in the air. compression of air is very linear (Boyles Law or PV=constant). In general, that's true, but take a look at what happens in the throats of high-powered horn loudspeakers. You can find info in e.g. "Acoustics" by Beranek. Isaac Red herring. It's important to know when a statement like: "There's no mixing happening in the air. compression of air is very linear" is nearly correct (because it's never precisely correct), and when it's really pretty incorrect. You can call that a "red herring" if you like; others might call it "knowing what you're talking about". Isaac |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|