Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna art wrote:
On 6 Jul, 20:15, wrote: In rec.radio.amateur.antenna art wrote: On 5 Jul, 22:25, Jeff Liebermann wrote: Radium hath wroth: Radio waves are made up of electric and magnetic fields. Yep. Couldn't the Spin Exchange Relaxation Free Magnetometer receive the magnetic portions of AM radio waves at the carrier frequencies I described? If not, why? Nope. 1. The range of the magnetic field is limited. For example, you're not going to bounce (errr... refract) a magnetic fields off the ionosphere. 2. Magentometers use very big coils. Very big coils have lots of inductance. Resonant circuits with lots of inductance tend to resonate at very low frequencies. Figure on maybe 30Hz being the highest frequency detectable by a magnetometer. Most roll off even earlier to avoid 60Hz power line pickup. 3. Magnetometers are expensive. You're proposing using one as a replacement for a 5 cent silicon diode detector. If the technology doesn't get to you, the accountants will. Agreed, static magnetic fields tend to decay rapidly as you move away from them. However, alternating magnetic fields continue to propogate by generating alternating electric fields of the same frequency. These alternating electric fields, in turn, generate alternating magnetic fields. The cycle keeps repeating. Rubbish. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 I believe that the standard example of radiation referred to above is in error. Belief doesn't make reality. I do not believe that radiation consists of fields of any sort but consists of ejected static particles in form of a swarm. A hundred years or so of experments say that's utter, babbling, nonsense. I have asked the Eham forum to wade in on that one since it appears they have more scientifically molecular inclined members. Right. The only cycle that repeates in radiation is the tank circuit of a diagmagnetic material which is resonant i.e. equal capacitance and inductance. Seems like the posts are relying on propagating fields which to me is an error. I'd suggest fluphenazine and haloperidol. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Jim, In the past you have shown that you are not that smart and I see of no evidence of any change. Suggest you review "particles" in nuclear physics, tho I suppose some could see a swarm of particles as a "wave" tho certainly not in the electrical sense. Seems like you take comfort in harrassing people with statements that have no reality. I have the strong suspicion that you are also short in stature and thus have a macho feeling in hiding. I personally have proved that radiation is in particle form where you do not have the ability to prove anything. Babbling, delusional nonsense. Seek help. There are drugs that may help your condition if you are treated early enough. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Take apart Ranger VFO drive mechanism? | Boatanchors | |||
New PC-based receiver at Universal Radio | Shortwave | |||
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
Spin, LARDASS, Spin | General | |||
We Need a BANDWIDTH-BASED Frequency Plan - NOT Mode-Based. | Policy |