On 7 Jul, 04:10, "Dave" wrote:
wrote in message

news
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna art wrote:

Babbling, delusional nonsense.

Seek help.

There are drugs that may help your condition if you are treated
early enough.

--
Jim Pennino

let them go jim... art and radium were made for each other.

David, you had every opportunity to debate the issue
as everybody else did on this newsgroup. Unfortuately
this newsgroup is not monitored which allows movement
from civil and scientific debate.
Thus in the quest of true scientific and civil debate
I have for the moment engaged in debate with Tom W8TI who
is extremely skilled in the art of antennas and certainly
regarded as a man of repute which excels that of resident
members of this group. I suggest that you both follow
that debate which is being held in a gentlemanly fashion
and compare it to the tack often taken on this newsgroup.
Art

On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 06:52:24 -0700, art wrote:

Unfortuately
this newsgroup is not monitored which allows movement
from civil and scientific debate.

My, my, my, Arthur!

If a monitored forum for your amateur radio theories was that
IMPORTANT; then you would submit them to a monitored forum instead of
here. Given you find this is such a poor venue (oddly your choice of
forum), it follows that the poor quality of your work can only survive
here, doesn't it?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On 7 Jul, 07:27, Richard Clark wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 06:52:24 -0700, art wrote:
Unfortuately
this newsgroup is not monitored which allows movement
from civil and scientific debate.

My, my, my, Arthur!

If a monitored forum for your amateur radio theories was that
IMPORTANT; then you would submit them to a monitored forum instead of
here. Given you find this is such a poor venue (oddly your choice of
forum), it follows that the poor quality of your work can only survive
here, doesn't it?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard,
watch the debate on Eham that is held in gentlemany fashion
and with a proponent of knoweledge to which you aspire to
and have failed miserably7 Tom is only one of many that
have moved to E ham because of the discusting and rude behaviour
of you and many others. Experts see no reason to discuss radio
with such an ignoramous as you and leave. I am engaging him in debate
about radiation on a point by point scientific manner and to
achieve such a debate I have followed him to the E ham forum
so such a debate could occur. For the lemmings that follow you I
suggest you review the advisability of the continuance of your
choice of leader. Please excuse my absence from this thread
for a short while while I am away enjoying a debate regarding
ham radio with an expert in a areana of experts. Ofcourse I will
return to watch your writhing in agony.
Art Unwin KB9MZ........XG (uk)

On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:08:09 -0700, art wrote:

watch the debate on Eham that is held in gentlemany fashion
and with a proponent of knoweledge to which you aspire to
and have failed miserably7

Hi Arthur,

Who cluod be oeffnded when they can't ustnanderd you for all the
mipellssings7

Tom is only one of many

Yes he is.

Please excuse my absence from this thread
for a short while while I am away enjoying a debate regarding
ham radio with an expert in a areana of experts.

Odd you leave that sandbox and keep coming back here, isn't it? ;-)

When you do, enjoy my new thread "20 Questions - Redux." (That is WHY
you keep returning n'est pas?)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:08:09 -0700, art wrote:

watch the debate on Eham that is held in gentlemany fashion

What a howler!

Thanx Arthur, I did just that and it seems to conform to that old
observation that a gentlemany is one who stands up in his bathtub to
take a pee:

by KB9CRY on July 7, 2007
... when you make up the logic one must understand that it may have no real basis in the real world.

by KB9MZ on July 7, 2007
Sir, I do not know who you are not having read any of your writings,
now there's a friendly, inclusive response.
I meant no respect to you by not asking for your participation
aside from the obvious logic fault (or is it a deliberate spit in the
face?) - isn't this like telling someone to f**k off?

No doubt from his response (with all the characteristic flair of our
own correspondence here):
y KB9CRY on July 7, 2007
And back to you sir, then take your personal debate with Tom offline and out of the public forum.

Being coy is for nancy-boys, not gentleman.

However, the gauntlet seems to slung around with abandon, also typical
he
May I also remind you that in the past week or so I offered a theses to all
that I drew up which you have acknoweledged and read and thus
could have participated in a civil discussion. You chose not to do so.

So, by your own estimate, an uncivil discussion found in the land of
honey and myrrh - heaven forfend! Seems you have found a friend to
your theories. And then suddenly lost! How can this be?

Also characteristically saccharine and vituperative by turns, we find
you complaining to the same lyrics we are so familiar with he
by KB9MZ on July 4, 2007
I have presented a thesis on the process of radiatian
progression from a static particle to a final receiving antenna.
The progression starts from Gaussian law of static which is rejected by this group

Of course, the gentlemany serve up their comments in much the same
manner as the vipers offer he
by GM4AHW on June 27, 2007
Guys, this gentleman is pulling our collective legs.
I have read interminable postings of his in various places,
and it all comes to the same thing. Diddly-squat.

by KG6WOU on June 30, 2007
Yet, you seem to have an endless amount of time talking about it. ...
Why does Monty Python comes to mind here?

I hear the same hymn so often sung here with:
by KB9MZ on July 1, 2007
Because hams resist change there are endless statements,
words, denials and out of context repeats.

and the usual volume of micturition:
by KB9MZ on July 1, 2007
Yes, your play on words is exceptually good and exposes me
for what I am, a troll and a liar and a fraud.
The very idea that somebody could propose anything new
when all have delicate noses such as you is absolutely rediculous.

and the follow-ons are as poetic as those found he
by GM4AHW on July 1, 2007
Enough already! As you guys say.
30 posts - more than any other current post in any of eHam's forums.
Why is it that nuts always attract monkeys?

When 30 posts constitute a lengthy contribution, it would seem they
prefer their comic strips shorter, and not already colored in....

by KB9MZ on July 1, 2007
OK, OK, I get the message
In America they say "You are with us or against us, ....
Hopefully any reference to Gaussian antennas will be removed
from the face of the earth so that hams will not get angry with me any more.

by N3OX on July 1, 2007
a feeling of persecution is not sufficient evidence of a scientific breakthrough.

********************* WHEW! *********************

Hi Arthur,

I can well see the improvement in decorum, the gentility of
discussion, and the high arcing flow of elevated concepts. Your
followers embrace your every word and wait breathless in anticipation
of your continued comments. The fawning admiration runs for 1 to 2
posts in a thread (presuming you write the first 2 posts).

The devotion of your acolytes brings tears to their eyes. Or is it
the spit they endure with their upturned faces?

Maybe you could get your thesis published in the Republican National
Committee's next platform under emigration reform.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC