On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:08:09 -0700, art wrote:

watch the debate on Eham that is held in gentlemany fashion

What a howler!

Thanx Arthur, I did just that and it seems to conform to that old
observation that a gentlemany is one who stands up in his bathtub to
take a pee:

by KB9CRY on July 7, 2007
... when you make up the logic one must understand that it may have no real basis in the real world.

by KB9MZ on July 7, 2007
Sir, I do not know who you are not having read any of your writings,
now there's a friendly, inclusive response.
I meant no respect to you by not asking for your participation
aside from the obvious logic fault (or is it a deliberate spit in the
face?) - isn't this like telling someone to f**k off?

No doubt from his response (with all the characteristic flair of our
own correspondence here):
y KB9CRY on July 7, 2007
And back to you sir, then take your personal debate with Tom offline and out of the public forum.

Being coy is for nancy-boys, not gentleman.

However, the gauntlet seems to slung around with abandon, also typical
he
May I also remind you that in the past week or so I offered a theses to all
that I drew up which you have acknoweledged and read and thus
could have participated in a civil discussion. You chose not to do so.

So, by your own estimate, an uncivil discussion found in the land of
honey and myrrh - heaven forfend! Seems you have found a friend to
your theories. And then suddenly lost! How can this be?

Also characteristically saccharine and vituperative by turns, we find
you complaining to the same lyrics we are so familiar with he
by KB9MZ on July 4, 2007
I have presented a thesis on the process of radiatian
progression from a static particle to a final receiving antenna.
The progression starts from Gaussian law of static which is rejected by this group

Of course, the gentlemany serve up their comments in much the same
manner as the vipers offer he
by GM4AHW on June 27, 2007
Guys, this gentleman is pulling our collective legs.
I have read interminable postings of his in various places,
and it all comes to the same thing. Diddly-squat.

by KG6WOU on June 30, 2007
Yet, you seem to have an endless amount of time talking about it. ...
Why does Monty Python comes to mind here?

I hear the same hymn so often sung here with:
by KB9MZ on July 1, 2007
Because hams resist change there are endless statements,
words, denials and out of context repeats.

and the usual volume of micturition:
by KB9MZ on July 1, 2007
Yes, your play on words is exceptually good and exposes me
for what I am, a troll and a liar and a fraud.
The very idea that somebody could propose anything new
when all have delicate noses such as you is absolutely rediculous.

and the follow-ons are as poetic as those found he
by GM4AHW on July 1, 2007
Enough already! As you guys say.
30 posts - more than any other current post in any of eHam's forums.
Why is it that nuts always attract monkeys?

When 30 posts constitute a lengthy contribution, it would seem they
prefer their comic strips shorter, and not already colored in....

by KB9MZ on July 1, 2007
OK, OK, I get the message
In America they say "You are with us or against us, ....
Hopefully any reference to Gaussian antennas will be removed
from the face of the earth so that hams will not get angry with me any more.

by N3OX on July 1, 2007
a feeling of persecution is not sufficient evidence of a scientific breakthrough.

********************* WHEW! *********************

Hi Arthur,

I can well see the improvement in decorum, the gentility of
discussion, and the high arcing flow of elevated concepts. Your
followers embrace your every word and wait breathless in anticipation
of your continued comments. The fawning admiration runs for 1 to 2
posts in a thread (presuming you write the first 2 posts).

The devotion of your acolytes brings tears to their eyes. Or is it
the spit they endure with their upturned faces?

Maybe you could get your thesis published in the Republican National
Committee's next platform under emigration reform.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC