| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... Digital is nothing more than an analog device with too much gain and hysteresis, where the output is stuck at either high or low. Dig deep enough into any digital contrivance, and you'll find analog devices operating in this way. The real world is analog. (Just ask any analog engineer). We've been here before, too. The real world is the real world - it is neither "digital" nor "analog," which are terms used (at least when used correctly) to refer to two methods of encoding information about (or describing) the real world or some specific real-world parameter. And in case it makes you feel better about the answer, yes, I am (or at least have been) an "analog engineer." (Or rather, an engineer involved in the design of "analog" circuits and systems.) Bob M. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Take apart Ranger VFO drive mechanism? | Boatanchors | |||
| New PC-based receiver at Universal Radio | Shortwave | |||
| Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
| Spin, LARDASS, Spin | General | |||
| We Need a BANDWIDTH-BASED Frequency Plan - NOT Mode-Based. | Policy | |||