| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:30:13 -0700, Jeff Liebermann
wrote: Not really. If you really want weak signal reception, I suggest you look into SSB (scientific set back) modulation. what??!! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ John |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:30:13 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote: Not really. If you really want weak signal reception, I suggest you look into SSB (scientific set back) modulation. what??!! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Too subtle for you? It's called humor. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Larkin hath wroth:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:30:13 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote: Not really. If you really want weak signal reception, I suggest you look into SSB (scientific set back) modulation. what??!! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Sigh. Nobody here seems to have a sense of humor. SSB = Single Side Band Happy now? You sure take the fun out of acronym mutilation. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|