| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John Ferrell" wrote in message ... Don't overlook that you can parallel two quads to get to 50 ohms as well! OK, I took a mental excursion in that direction. My first thought is to use two runs of RG-62 93-ohm computer drop cable off a t-connector. This goes against my grain -- I've always hated using any t-connectors in a matched system -- but I guess the match will be maintained. My second thought is to literally parallel them at the end of a hunk of 50-ohm cable. That feed would need to be crossed over, I think, so the fields would be additive. Easy enough to test it both ways, I suppose. If crossover is needed, what would the pattern look like without it? Hm-m-m-m .... near-field cancellation and no pattern? Pattern rotation? Of course I will be trying this next idea even if no newsgroup answer is forthcoming: What happens if I tap off quad #1 on the side _opposite_ where I'm feeding it and connect quad #2 there? Wouldn't this additional load reflect back to feed #1 and lower its impedance toward 50 ohms? I don't know what feed #2 would be. Perhaps a jury-rig parallel line calculated to be 100 ohms would do it. (# 10 AWG wires on 5 mm centers would do it.) Phasing will be an issue. [I probably don't have a suitable test environment to tell success from failure.] 73, "Sal" |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The Good Old Days of SW | Shortwave | |||
| Good ole' Days | General | |||
| Back to the 'Good ol' days' | CB | |||
| 14.313 - the good old days - looking for recordings | General | |||
| BC's "good" days | Scanner | |||