BPL strikes another win ...
 

http://www.redherring.com/Home/22562

JS

BPL strikes another win ...
 

John Smith I wrote:
http://www.redherring.com/Home/22562

JS


Allot like dumping crude oil into a creek for 'Easy Transportation to
the Refinery', no extra infrastructure required.

BPL strikes another win ...
 

John Smith I wrote:
http://www.redherring.com/Home/22562

It's "your" own fault. When I complained to Google, no one else did.
When I suggested a boycot of Google, everyone thought I was crazy.

It was "your" choice, Google and their BPL, or Ham radio.
Which did you decide?

Geoff.

--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM
IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838
Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/

BPL strikes another win ...
 

Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:

...
It was "your" choice, Google and their BPL, or Ham radio.
Which did you decide?

Geoff.


When the sword challenged the rock, the sword won. When the gun
challenged the sword, the gun won. When the automobile challenged the
horse, the auto won. When the washing machine challenged the washboard,
the machine won. When tubes challenged the spark-gap xmitter, the tube
won. When penicillin challenged herbs, penicillin won. When the birth
control pill challenged the condom, the pill won.

Now the internet challenges code tapping amateurs ...

Regards,
JS

BPL strikes another win ...
 

John Smith I wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:

...
It was "your" choice, Google and their BPL, or Ham radio. Which did
you decide?

Geoff.


When the sword challenged the rock, the sword won. When the gun
challenged the sword, the gun won. When the automobile challenged the
horse, the auto won. When the washing machine challenged the washboard,
the machine won. When tubes challenged the spark-gap xmitter, the tube
won. When penicillin challenged herbs, penicillin won. When the birth
control pill challenged the condom, the pill won.

Now the internet challenges code tapping amateurs ...

Regards,
JS

Oh yeah, and I forgot, but you are quite correct. They were warned;
and, they thought they knew better. But then, their history does not
reflect one of a well educated or "gray matter endowed" group ... the
few intelligent amateurs' voice were drowned out by the insane masses
.... now we have what they strode towards with such determination, while
beating out a war march tune on their brass keys--amateur freqs will be
assimilated by the internet, resistance is futile ... and God seen this
was good ...

Regards,
JS

BPL strikes another win ...
 

John Smith I wrote:
http://www.redherring.com/Home/22562

JS

Hello John and all:

One of the things that I haven't seen covered about BPL, is the
installation and maintenance costs involved, in a power grid system.

We all know that when a system is modified for something that it wasn't
designed for that problems will surface. I'll bet money that the power
grid system modification and maintenance may be have a significant cost.
That was not totally covered, or audited.

Jay in the Mojave

BPL strikes another win ...
 

John Smith I wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:

...

It was "your" choice, Google and their BPL, or Ham radio. Which did
you decide?

Geoff.


When the sword challenged the rock, the sword won. When the gun
challenged the sword, the gun won. When the automobile challenged the
horse, the auto won. When the washing machine challenged the washboard,
the machine won. When tubes challenged the spark-gap xmitter, the tube
won. When penicillin challenged herbs, penicillin won. When the birth
control pill challenged the condom, the pill won.

Now the internet challenges code tapping amateurs ...

Regards,
JS

This has nothing to do with the Internet or code tapping amateurs.

It has to do with some intellectually devoid engineers challenging the
reality of the Nyquist rate and placing a device on the only radio
frequencys that can be naturally propagated through out the planet.

This group will be beaming porn wirelessly throughout the world, what an
accomplishment. They should feel proud!


Chris

BPL strikes another win ...
 

Christopher Cox wrote:
John Smith I wrote:

...

Now the internet challenges code tapping amateurs ...


This has nothing to do with the Internet or code tapping amateurs.

It has to do with some intellectually devoid engineers challenging the
reality of the Nyquist rate and placing a device on the only radio
frequencys that can be naturally propagated through out the planet.

No, I think the engineers are saying 'It can be done, but it will
interfere...' and the bean counters look at the 'but it will
interfere...' part as the obstacle to overcome (buy off). Engineers
don't call the shots, the lawyers and accountants do. If you want
someone or something to blame, blame the 'any profit is good' mind set
of the greed heads and the politicians who obey their big campaign
contributors.

BPL strikes another win ...
 

On Aug 16, 12:03 am, John Smith I wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:

...

It was "your" choice, Google and their BPL, or Ham radio.
Which did you decide?

Geoff.

When the sword challenged the rock, the sword won. When the gun
challenged the sword, the gun won. When the automobile challenged the
horse, the auto won. When the washing machine challenged the washboard,
the machine won. When tubes challenged the spark-gap xmitter, the tube
won. When penicillin challenged herbs, penicillin won. When the birth
control pill challenged the condom, the pill won.

Now the internet challenges code tapping amateurs ...

When my henry 2k classic and yagi pointed at the power line challenges
BPL...
Hummmm, this could get ugly... No matter what mode I use. BPL is a two
lane highway. I should be as much of a pest them to them, as them to
me..
Two weeks of me, and I'll have the BPL/power company speaking in
tongues if
they ever decide to install that mess around here.
MK

BPL strikes another win ...
 

gwatts wrote:
Christopher Cox wrote:

John Smith I wrote:

...

Now the internet challenges code tapping amateurs ...


This has nothing to do with the Internet or code tapping amateurs.

It has to do with some intellectually devoid engineers challenging the
reality of the Nyquist rate and placing a device on the only radio
frequencys that can be naturally propagated through out the planet.


No, I think the engineers are saying 'It can be done, but it will
interfere...' and the bean counters look at the 'but it will
interfere...' part as the obstacle to overcome (buy off). Engineers
don't call the shots, the lawyers and accountants do. If you want
someone or something to blame, blame the 'any profit is good' mind set
of the greed heads and the politicians who obey their big campaign
contributors.



I apologize for specifying "Engineers" in my previous post, it was not
intentional.

It is frustrating when fact is trumped by the use of relentless verbiage.

Chris