Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() sounds like a regular dipole will do the same for less ![]() always interesting to see different designs and opinions tho!! On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 20:37:11 -0700, wrote: On Sep 8, 7:09 pm, Owen Duffy wrote: My study of a typical Double Bazooka antenna system athttp://www.vk1od.net/DoubleBazooka/index.htmindicates that although it might have slightly greater VSWR bandwidth (FWIW), it has more loss than a conventional dipole. I believe Walter Maxwell also wrote an article about that a few years back. There is no free lunch with the double bazookas. I don't use them myself. Not so much because of the slight extra loss, more that coax weighs too much to use as antenna wire unless you have really strong supports. Regular wire is also a good bit cheaper. :/ MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
antennas and rain | Antenna | |||
R-7000 in the rain | Antenna | |||
R-7000 in the rain | Antenna | |||
FA Gutter Mount CB Antenna New | Swap | |||
Gutter Mount CB ant New | Swap |