Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 23, 12:34 pm, wrote:
Has anybody a solution to speedup the NEC-Engine, using multiple CPU- Cores? In standard use, only one NEC-Engine is running. The NEC-Engine does not use multi-threading technique and therefore only one CPU-Core is running. The NEC engine calls standard matrix math routines, so one can replace the libraries with a multicore library (or, even, with a MPI based cluster library). This can help a lot on huge models (thousands of segments) Todays computers have multiple cores. Even I am using one with two cores (Intel Dual-Core). And there are more cores available in the future (3,4 and more). My question is, is threre a solution for speeding up the antenna calculation using NEC2/4-Engine? If not, I plan to code a wrapper NEC- Engine, that is able to busy all CPU-Cores and merging the results to one output file. Especially antenna calculation can be easly divided into multiple parts (eg. radiation pattern division). If there is a solution, I do not want to reinvent the tire again. Or when you're doing multiple frequencies. The NEC engine does things in several chunks: a) building the matrix from all the geometry, including the coupling between segments -this is frequency dependent b) solving the matrix for the segment currents - this is a straightforward (but time consuming) linear equation solving process c) calculating the field by integrating all the segment currents - this is independent among the az/el's or near field points in the output. So there's opportunities for parallelism in each of the three chunks, some of which are almost embarassingly parallel (EP). a) if you're doing an analysis at multiple frequencies, running each frequency on a separate machine/core is a great idea, since they're essentially independent. b) as you suggested, breaking up the output computation (c, above) is a natural c) using a multicore or cluster matrix math package can help with b, above. Whatever you do, you should seriously contemplate basing your work on the NEC4 engine, rather than the older NEC 2 engine. Sure, you'll have to pay for it, but it's structured better for what you want to do, and more accurate to boot. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Seo , Search Engine Optimizer , Seo Search engine Optimization , search engine optimization services, SEO Consulting | Policy | |||
Binocular cores available | Shortwave | |||
Amidon Cores?? | Homebrew | |||
Ferrite Cores | Shortwave | |||
TV type Ferrite Cores / Ferrite Cores / Magnetic Longwire Baluns (MLBs) and more | Shortwave |