Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art wrote:
....for the same power expended in the same amount of time a full wave radiator radiates twice the power that a quarter wave does. _________ So then where does the missing power applied to the 1/4-wave radiator go, if only half of its input power is converted to EM radiation? RF |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Fry" wrote in message ... Art wrote: ....for the same power expended in the same amount of time a full wave radiator radiates twice the power that a quarter wave does. _________ So then where does the missing power applied to the 1/4-wave radiator go, if only half of its input power is converted to EM radiation? RF i am convinced that art is playing dumb on purpose.... no one with any knowledge of antennas and em fields could possible get this screwed up on basic concepts. when he was just talking 'gaussian' and 'equilibrium' stuff it could easily be laughed off as someone with a little bit of knowledge trying to force the rest of the world into that single concept. but now with decaying electrons and current down the center of the conductor and a missing half cycle its just too far gone. i had been kind of tagging along tweaking him into trying to explain the details of his concept, but now it is apparent that he has none. he is just making it up and stringing us along. you gone too far this time art, ciao and enjoy your game alone. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Oct, 15:11, "Dave" wrote:
"Richard Fry" wrote in message ... Art wrote: ....for the same power expended in the same amount of time a full wave radiator radiates twice the power that a quarter wave does. _________ So then where does the missing power applied to the 1/4-wave radiator go, if only half of its input power is converted to EM radiation? RF i am convinced that art is playing dumb on purpose.... no one with any knowledge of antennas and em fields could possible get this screwed up on basic concepts. when he was just talking 'gaussian' and 'equilibrium' stuff it could easily be laughed off as someone with a little bit of knowledge trying to force the rest of the world into that single concept. but now with decaying electrons and current down the center of the conductor and a missing half cycle its just too far gone. i had been kind of tagging along tweaking him into trying to explain the details of his concept, but now it is apparent that he has none. he is just making it up and stringing us along. you gone too far this time art, ciao and enjoy your game alone. Awe common Dave don't go away this is fun! Now what is wrong with current going down the center because the impedance is less than 377 ohms? Remember if you go up in altitude the 377 impedance will go down and become less that the wires internal impedance the energy will transfer to space with that smell of ozone. That is what happened in Quito Equador That is what led to the design of the quad where a lesser impedance path was provided for current flow! Now the inner impedance of the wire must be pretty high to create an end effect so with Isq R there has to be a lot of heat generated. Remember Vincent saying his first antenna melted? Now we come to rotation of a projectile. Did you know that a projectile tumbles and comes under the influence of the Corrioli effect as it losses energy.A shell starts to tumble when it exceeds it's range Next time a rocket goes into space watch for rotation. What do you think causes that? A train speeds along on a railroad until at a certain speed it will roll over, why do you think that happens? Look up "hammer blow" for that one. How can I possibly be stringing you along? You can put everything to bed by spending a 1/2 hour making a full wave antenna but ofcourse that means an effort to get off the couch ! Yup It is better to stay rested and let your mouth do all the work at least until you start to dribble. Art Unwin KB9MZ....XG |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave" wrote about Art's posts:
i am convinced that art is playing dumb on purpose.... no one with any knowledge of antennas and em fields could possible get this screwed up on basic concepts. and Walt W2DU wrote: I'm enjoying every minute of your entertainment presentations, and I'd miss them dearly if you left the thread ___________ Art could really know better, and might be posting what he does as some form of personal amusement. The only problem with that is some readers of his posts may think his posts are accurate, unless others who know they are not make the effort to post the correct information. RF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna |